patching...
Update: Stay current with news affecting Forsyth County and Cumming - Subscribe to the Cumming Patch Newsletter - It's FREE! »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Is Benghazi Likely to Impact the President's Re-Election Efforts?

As information continues to emerge, more and more news outlets are beginning to ask whether it will impact the president’s re-election campaign.

 

As more information surfaces on the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi that left four Americans dead, news organizations are starting to question whether it will impact the president’s chances for re-election.

Even before Fox News released a story Friday that the CIA was denied two requests to send in reinforcements during the attack and eventually told to stand down, The Huffington Post asked whether all this is the smoking gun - or will it be attributed to the fog of war?

The Huffington Post acknowledges that an investigation is definitely required, but is urging that the investigation be bi-partisan. But are any investigations bi-partisan anymore?

Although The Huffington Post makes reference to “the usual spin from news sources such as Fox News and Breitbart,” even it acknowledges that some of the facts emerging could be troubling for the White House and the president. And that was before the latest information emerging about the CIA.

What do you think? Could Benghazi be the straw that breaks the camels back in the president’s re-election efforts? Or will it be regarded more as the fog of war than any smoking gun?

Related Topics: 2012 elections

Steve R.

9:03 am on Saturday, October 27, 2012

I don't see it hurting Obama. The simpletons in this country are more upset with what Ann Coulter and Donald Trump are saying than they are with Americans dying due to the incompetence of their Hope and Change blessing.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steve R.

9:07 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

MWTW, you're right. I was being facetious. See my other post below. The whole mess is a disgrace to our Nation and the response by the left is typical and expected.

Obama cancels events for "Sandy" but not Benghazi. The weather isn't "OPTIMAL" for Obama but Las Vegas was fine the day after Americans were Butchered by Islamic Terrorists. What A Puke!

Mary Groeger

10:45 am on Saturday, October 27, 2012

How basic does an issue have to be? The date: 9/11. The location: a country in turmoil. Cries for help from our AMBASSADOR!: 3. If this does not affect the outcome of the election, then our country is lost.

Reply

George Wilson

11:37 am on Saturday, October 27, 2012

Most of what touches Fox news is bias and is not a credible source.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris

11:58 am on Saturday, October 27, 2012

Your boy can't hide this George. His cover up has failed. Been telling you forever, he was a moron. You and I both know that Hillary is NOT going to take a political hit for this fraud you think so highly of. Get used to it. He's finished.

Comment_arrow

r patton

10:36 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Biased or accurate as the other new organizations are so far up the Comrades A _ _ it's not funny!

Comment_arrow

r patton

10:38 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Biased or accurate? Most of what Fox reports the other news agencis are afraid to report because they are afraid of Comrade obama. He migh yell "Boo" at them and they would fall over crying for their mommies!

Tammy Osier

11:42 am on Saturday, October 27, 2012

Unfortunately, Mary, the electorate of this president cares more about Entertainment Tonight than they do the lives of those people. They woule pay more attention if their son or daughter was in that Embassy and the president had more important things to do than go over security briefs. Have you noticed that they continually DEFEND obama even when the evidence is piling up? Why do they defend him? I believe Thomas Sowell said it best. he said," We elected a man with no experience on symbolism...when you wake up in a nuclear heap one morning and your family is dead, will it matter that your elected someone who symbolized something?" Here's a great interview on him by Larry Elder.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PmylSqArutQ

Reply

George Wilson

12:37 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012

@Tammy osier
The Republicans from day one of this tragedy have tried to achieve some kind of political advantage by making it a political issue. Lets not forget, that when the state department requested additional funding for security that the Republican congress cut their request. Why aren't we hearing more about this fact? Let's not forget that from day one the administration said that they didn't have all the facts and would investigate and report back to the American people. Lets' not forget that the Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta, said that they did not have adequate intelligence and felt like they should not put American forces at risk. He said, "The attack happened over a few hours and was over before the U.S. had the chance to know what really happened". He also said," a basic principle is that you don't deploy forces into harm's way without knowing what is going on." I think thank Romney choose to shoot from the hip in a premature, irresponsible, immature, way. This is a desperate man that will say and does anything to win this election .My fear is that he is surrounded by Neo Cons that would love to manipulate a new untried President, like George Bush, to get us into another war in the Middle East. A war with IRAN is likely under a Romney administration.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steve R.

1:17 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012

George, you've already tried the funding line. Not working in this case. Obama wanted everyone singing Kumbaya with these savages in Libya, so he left Libyans in charge of the Ambassador. They then turned on the Ambassador and killed him. After this Terrorist Attack, Obama said he was ordering an increase in security at all U.S. diplomatic missions in Libya and across the region. If the money isn’t there due to the Republicans, where’s he getting the money now? He dropped the ball and he thought he could save his job by lying about it.

Your words – “This is a desperate man that will say and does anything to win this election”. That’s exactly what he did in 2008 and enough suckers fell for it.

Your words – “A war with IRAN is likely under a Romney administration”. That’s right because Obama hasn’t done enough to stop Iran from building weapons. We’re running out of time. There a ton of more sanctions that could be applied to delay Iran if nothing else but Obama won’t do it. He’s a community organizer, not a true leader.

Tammy Osier

1:26 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012

Steve, that's usually the way it goes. Clinton dropped the ball and appeased our enemies until someone else came into office (that they KNEW would not appease them). Bush got the crap on that one. Funny isn't it? Democrats appease, inflame enemies, republicans always left to clean up the mess. Going back as far as carter and move forward. The last good democrat we had was kennedy. He knew the enemy and how to deal with them. He was also a fiscal conservative even though a democrat. I could compare him to Clinton though as far as leadership goes. They both knew how to work with others and it paid off in many areas.

Reply

Jim Aspen

1:29 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012

This President is lying so much about Benghazi it is pathetic.

Reply

Tammy Osier

1:34 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012

@ George - Here's a hypothetical for you- just suppose- let's pretend- What if they are right? What is your response then? Will you for once offer an honest appraisal of your candidate?

Reply

George Wilson

1:46 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012

@Tammy Osier
All of my appraisals have been correct and based on fact.

Reply

Tammy Osier

2:01 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012

I knew you'd dodge the question. Just because you say something is so, doesn't make it a fact. Please prove these things so that we can see for ourselves. I can look in my paycheck and see the results of this administration. I know how to research both sides and come to a conclusion. Do that, and then we may all be able to sit at the table and talk. Not trying to be disrespectful, but there comes a point where you sound like a parrot-parroting what the liberal press throws out, knowing you will repeat it. Then, answer the question.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Amy Jellicoe

8:51 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012

I guess 4 years ago, you didn't lose your job or house, and gas prices didn't go up on you. Were you in the state of GA? Better yet, were you in the USA? And nothing against George Bush, I think he was a fine President. He didn't become President under the most ideal situation, but to blame this mess on just one person is ridiculous. Knock it off.

Comment_arrow

Todd

8:56 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012

@Amy: Actually, personally, I *AM* better off than I was four years ago. Thanks to the president's policies, I own my own home, am no longer living from paycheck to paycheck, and have enough money to pay bills, buy food, clothes, and even extras like private school and sports activities for my children. And yes, I do live in Georgia.

Comment_arrow

Amy Jellicoe

9:08 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012

@Todd: I'm also better off than i was 4 years ago. I'm making DOUBLE what I made 4 years ago. I almost lost my home 4 years ago. Now my mortgage payment is reduced by $800. I recently bought a new car, and my kids went from getting free lunch at school, to reduced lunch. Yeah, my life is hella better. I'd like to become a citizen of the same planet that Tammy resides where life was better 4 years ago. I would have much rather not go through those hard times.

Comment_arrow

Karsten Torch

4:06 pm on Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Amy, nobody blames the crap economy back in 2008 on Obama. What we ARE blaming on his Highness is the crap economy we're still in. Relying on governemnt to fix anything is the first mistake. What we're dealing with now is some improvement in certain areas, but everything is no tenuous that we can slide at any time. Businesses aren't hiring or investing because there's no faith in the future.

Mary Lou

3:22 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012

Gosh I sure hope the American public wakes up to the lies and it affects his election, so we dont have a repeat of it later on down the road. It has now been uncovered the watched this unfold in live true color action, had every bit the authority financially and other wise to stop it, they did NOTHING and then I ASSUME, yes I am ASSUMING thought they could lie and cover their way out of it, but oops. technology wasn't on their side no matter how much the media and others were. This is sick. I hope the elections clearly show how much Americans truly are, still American!

Reply

Steve R.

3:50 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012

According to Obama, Americans are just "These Folks" and the Terrorists are "Those Folks".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=hKSey7M1c8o

These folks, those folks, you folks, my folks, all folks, some folks...
Just folks

Reply

Tammy Osier

5:11 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012

Yes. they watched it in real time. Answer the question Goerge. I guess the more we find out about it, the les likely we are to hear from our liberal friends. Too bad. They have an opportunity to look at something critically instead of excuse making. Fina;;y something they can't make an excuse about. Question for those who are still undecided:
If your son or daughter were over there, do you want barrack obama at the helm? 66% ofthe military do NOT want him at the helm any longer. That ought to tell you what you need to know.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Good Grief Y'all

10:52 am on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

"If your son or daughter were over there, do you want barrack obama at the helm?" Absodamnlutely! Certainly not the cowardly Romney, who spent the Vietnam war years hiding out in France recruiting members for LDS (that's not charity work! and not a conscientious objector either), while he was a vocal proponent of the war. Romney - the guy who would send your kids to a war zone but not his or his friends' offspring.

Comment_arrow

R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"

1:03 am on Saturday, November 3, 2012

So what is the CURRENT president's military record?

Did he by chance serve as a corpseman in one of the branches?

Tammy Osier

5:25 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012

Answer the question George. To keep credibility, you have to be able to answer questions and give a view on both sides. Problem is, you can only give one view. You can't answer the question because of that.

Reply

Mary Lou

5:44 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012

I haven't seen a reply from George Wilson on here yet since he so proudly stated good eating habits start at school, on the other thread. Have a fantastic evening peoples :)

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rex Smithers

6:43 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012

He may have had a poop accident or maybe it was time for a sponge bath.

Tammy Osier

5:48 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012

Since I won't get an answer from George and friends:
Question for those who are still undecided:
Based on the information we now have, if your son or daughter were over there, do you want barrack obama at the helm?

Reply
Comment_arrow

GregRodgers

1:09 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

My Brother was over there...in Afganastan (Naval Physicians Assistant ) and he and I both support the Obama!

Tammy Osier

6:30 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012

Well, it is nightfall and the crickets have begun to chirp...

Reply

Todd

9:02 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012

I know it is hard for you staunch Republicans to imagine, but this is how I felt eight years ago when Dubya was going up for a second term. Frustration with the current administration, in fear for the country, and angry that people could be so complacent with someone who clearly was so terrible for the American People.

I want a fiscal conservative and a social liberal. If I want limited government, I also want that to include government getting the hell out of women's uteri. (uteruses?)

I want the people who are against "George and his friends" to slap themselves because when they accuse him of "buying into the mainstream liberal media pap" they themselves are doing the exact same thing, just instead buying into the fox media juggernaut pap. That road goes both ways, kids.

In closing, no one is going to change George's mind. Or Tammy's mind. Or Rex or Mary Lou or me. Our minds are made up. So why are we all worked up here over the internet? Go play with your families and don't worry so much about stuff. I guarantee you, Georgia will still be a red state when you wake up on November 7, no matter how many Georges there are in this area.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Amy Jellicoe

12:08 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Todd,
I just want to acknowledge one of the most logical comments on this page. These people really enjoy this foolishness.

Neil Stapley

12:41 am on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Romney has time and time again accused the president of failing in his Foreign policy but in the next trying to appase moderate independants say he wouldn't do anything different. Ryan talks about funding the military but his own draft budget slashes it. We may have less ships than in 1916 but 1 carrier battle group today has more fire power than the entire US Fleet in 1916. Romney talks about building our military by building more ships , more, more plans, more tanks a tank isn't going to stop Iran or China hacking into our computer networks. sending a tank into a mountainous region in North Africa is pointless. The Presidents, defence departments plans of building our cyber defence networks, greater use of special forces and drones is the right way to go. The use of economic sanctions is hurting Iran Acmawhatshisname is increasingly being sideline by Ayatollah. What's arming the rebels in Syria going to achieve but yet again it back fireing on US just like it did when we tried to manipulate Afganistan with regards to the Russians and US supporting the Taliban. Iraq with us supporting Sadam against Iran. Yep the 1980's is calling and it wants its failed foreign policy back.

Reply
Comment_arrow

George Wilson

12:32 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

@ Neil Stapley
Thanks for taking the time to get some real facts out.You are correct in your comments,but i'm afraid some of these thoughts will go against the right- wing Fox News bubble that these people live in.

Comment_arrow

R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"

1:06 am on Saturday, November 3, 2012

@ George what is this strange fascination with Fox News?

Have you PERSONALLY actually watched any of it?

Rex Smithers

6:36 am on Sunday, October 28, 2012

This terrorist attack may involve far more than is being discussed here. Is anyone else researching a bigger picture? How about maybe that Ambassador Stevens was in Benghazi on September 11, 2012 to meet with his Turkish counterpart, who reportedly warned Stevens that the operation was compromised. This article may not be exactly factual but reasonable to enough to search deeper into what was going on leading up to the attack.
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/50586

Reply

Tammy Osier

7:38 am on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Going back to the original question and to answer Mr. Stapley- No. It won't have an impact because there is a faction of people who have a movie star / personality mentality when it comes to selecting a leader. NS- You may be right, BUT, Romney is still a heck of a sight bettr than what we have now. Israel is about ready to explode. We need someone to go back in there and keep the peace. I don't beleive we will have to worry about Romney having more time for JZ and The View than he does for his job. But having Romney in there opens the door for a better selection the next time around. IMHO.

Reply

Neil Stapley

8:00 am on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Tammy the British tried to keep the peace their and got a bloody nose for their efforts, by having our hands in all these little hot beds we are destined to repeat the mistakes of the past. The US is being manipulated by Isreal attempting to force our hand and Romney is lapping it up. We are not the worlds policeman? You talk about popularity Mitt has spent his life spinning his way to this job he has held every conceivable position in attempt to secure votes. All you have to do is compare Romney from the 2008 and 2012 primaries he holds different positions then you have the Romney in the 2012 election again one minute he is a hard line conservative the next he is a moderate Republican.

Reply

Neil Stapley

8:02 am on Sunday, October 28, 2012

By they way Rex you people harp on about freedom of speech so you don't like my voice of words boo hoo deal with it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rex Smithers

9:43 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Neil Stapley, apparently I don't HAVE to deal with it.

You sure use the "boo hoo" a lot. Do your parents know you use fowl language on line?

Tammy Osier

8:08 am on Sunday, October 28, 2012

NS - When I studied World History in college, I remember reading about the presidency where we became the world's policman. It was very interesting. I'll have to find that and expound later.
On Romney - for all those who criticize the TEA party, I'm telling you, the purpose of that group is to hold conservatives feet to the fire. I have a feeling he will have a tougher presidency that he thinks. People are tired of politicians and their "my way or the highway" approach. It will be interesting for sure.

Reply

Tammy Osier

8:10 am on Sunday, October 28, 2012

I just read th article that Rex posted. Might want to take a look folks...

Reply

Mary Lou

9:41 am on Sunday, October 28, 2012

I read it Tammy and Rex- but without even sayin a word..you know how here, at least..its going to get spun. Thanks for posting, Rex. Interesting, and frightening, indeed. Even more need for effective leadership on all fronts.

Reply

Denna Millard

10:30 am on Sunday, October 28, 2012

I am afraid it is distorting the presidential election. There has simply not been enough time to THOROUGHLY INVESTIGATE this terrible tragic incident. TOO MANY PEOPLE INVOLVED - I said, he said, she said, they said, 3 different agencies, etc The public wants a NOW ANSWER. The heck with the truth. This occurrence could not have come at a worse time!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steve R.

10:36 am on Sunday, October 28, 2012

"This occurrence could not have come at a worse time"

Really? Maybe you could recommend a more "optimal" time for Americans to be murdered by Islamic Terrorists? I'm sure the family members of those murdered would have liked some say in it as well.

So we can put you down as a YES.

Comment_arrow

John B

11:13 am on Sunday, October 28, 2012

The only thing being distorted is the truth. I agree it's a complex situation but IMO what has ticked off the American public is a concerted effort by the current administration to play the shell game for political reasons. I also think if they weren't so adamant about the "spontaneous reaction to a video" their wouldn't be as much scrutiny in how this whole thing was handled. Right now, I have no doubt that this is an integrity issue with independents. The bases won't move but the independents....I bet it will move the needle for them.

Tammy Osier

1:16 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

George - I could cut and paste all day whre i said a simple thing and you turned it round adn made it into a completely different sentence (to fit your agenda, of course). You really can't accuse others. Like I said before, if you only have one point of view and WON'T even consider the other side, then there is no conversation. I love it when I actually converse with people on here without having to defend myself form attacks. I just ignore them for the most part (bigger thing to do).
Also, finding out alot in different state newspapers...Iowa and a few other normally liberal states are swinging to the right in droves. The people who haven't been counted in the regular polling will weight in come Nov. 6.

Reply
Comment_arrow

George Wilson

2:35 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

@Tammy Osier
On the internet, grammar and spelling errors are common for many reasons. Better spelling, grammar, and punctuation help you communicate with more people because more people can understand you. Therefore, it's good netiquette to use a spell check program because it makes your message easier to read.
It is good netiquette to look past any grammar errors when communicating on the internet because there are so many different reasons for them. Make a mental note of errors and keep reading. Grammar errors do mean something about the author and spell check programs are not perfect."

Tammy Osier

1:21 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

John B. - that's what I'm seeing and it's encouraging. The ones who are undecided are actually the smarter of all of us. They weight things through the eyes of critical thinking. They are the ons who haven't been polled yet since they probably didn't vote last time or only voted in presidential elections. Got to return common sense and decency back to the people.

Reply

Joseph Robert

2:32 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Did you Republicans complain against GW Bush, after his leadership led to these attacks on US diplomatic posts?

June 14, 2002, U.S. consulate in Karachi, Pakistan
Suicide bomber kills 12 and injures 51.

February 28, 2003, U.S. consulate in Karachi, Pakistan
Gunmen on motorcycles killed two consulate guards.

July 30, 2004, U.S. embassy in Taskkent, Uzbekistan
Suicide bomber kills two.

December 6, 2004, U.S. consulate in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia Militants stormed and occupied perimeter wall.
Five killed, 10 wounded.

March 2, 2006, U.S. consulate in Karachi, Pakistan Suicide car bomber
killed four, including a U.S. diplomate directly targeted by the assailants.

September 12, 2006, U.S. embassy in Damascus, Syria
Gunmen attacked embassy with grenades, automatic weapons, and a car bomb. One killed and 13 wounded.

January 12, 2007, U.S. embassy in Athens, Greece
A rocket-propelled grenade was fired at the embassy building. No one was injured.

July 9, 2008, U.S. consulate in Istanbul, Turkey
Armed men attacked consulate with pistols and shotguns. Three policemen killed.

September 17, 2008, U.S. embassy in Sana'a, Yemen
Militants dressed as policemen attacked the embassy with RPGs, rifles, grenades and car bombs. Six Yemeni soldiers and seven civilians were killed. Sixteen more were injured.

I didn't think so !

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steve R.

3:17 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Yes, thank you Joseph Robert for all the hard work. If you wanted to help though, you could have attached links. Although I have not yet researched these you have posted, I have in the past researched terrorist attacks on Americans since September 11, 2001. I have argued with Republicans that Americans have in fact been victims of terrorist attacks outside the US while Bush was President and since Obama started his Rule. To my knowledge, the only successful Islamic Terrorist attack inside the Continental USA, was the Fort Hood Massacre that the present administration chooses to call "workplace violence".

The question is not have we been attacked or will we be attacked again. Terrorist attacks will never cease. Ever! I ask you, if you can, point out how many of the attacks you listed above were witnessed via live video stream and explained as something completely different than what was known as fact by the administration in charge.

I will research your data above but without even starting, I can tell you that not all of the attacks you have listed, involved American citizens. In fact I'm going to guess that less than half resulted in any American deaths.

I will also go out on a limb and assume that NONE of these attacks resulted in cover ups by the Bush administration. If I'm wrong, prove it.

Comment_arrow

Jean Hoffman

11:22 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Romney's only foreign policy experience is:
Opening bank accounts in Switzerland, the Cayman Islands and Bermuda, so he could evade taxes!

In these turbulent times we live in, that's VERY SCARY. Especially with Romney's bad and controlling temper, ready to get the US involved in a new war (like his friend GW Bush did)!

George Wilson

2:44 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

@Joseph Robert
Thanks for the excellent research and confirms my belief that the right is only trying to cook this up as a political issue. This has already backfired on them by showing that Romney is a light weight in foreign policy and an opportunist.

Reply

Mike Chubre

3:08 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

The republicans watched Iraqi trucks haul what could of been wmd for 4 months to Syria . Bush knew this and it was reported on Fox so called News . So the republicans sent in our troops after watching this and the reps acted like it was an emergency for our troops to go in . They sent our troops in without the equipment they needed , one example is the steel sheilds on Humvees and jeeps and so forth. Some of our troops had to go to local scrap yards to get metal to weld onto their trucks to protect them from machine gun fire. This is fact ask some who went and look it up . . How many troops got killed going into Iraq for daddy Bush , not to liberate the people but to take out Sadamm for daddy Bush . And when we got into Iraq guess what ??? DUHHHHHHHHH no WMD . Afetr watching the tractor trailers hauling back and forth to Syria ? Fox even mentioned they might have wmd on them ! People forget its the republicans that get us into all the wars we have had. American oil companies are now pumping oil in Iraq , the reason we went in for . And now the reps are doing all they can to discredit Obama over Libya . Your not fooling anyone you republican war mongers

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steve R.

3:24 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

God Grief! Here we go again!

MIKE Chubre, could you please site a resource of these facts?

Thank you

Comment_arrow

Neil Stapley

8:48 am on Tuesday, October 30, 2012

David no its our every increasing thirst for black gold that got us into war in the middle east. The Republican Guard, wasn't even dented by Shock and Awe, because they were moved out of harms way it wasn't until 2003 that they were disbanded along with the Iraqi ordinary army against the advice of everyone in the coalition. In fact it was alleged that Donald Rumsfeld via the CIA signed a pact with them allowing them safe passage out of the country if they stood down.

Why haven't we targeted Saudi Arabia as pretty much all the terrorist attacks at home and our interests abroad have been initiated by Saudi nationals.

Comment_arrow

Neil Stapley

9:00 am on Tuesday, October 30, 2012

By the way when I refer to the Middle East I am referring to Iraq not Afghanistan because what you term "the greater middle east" doesn't exist as you would then be including Pakistan and India in that group as well as multiple former Soviet states ending in Stan. The middle east consists of Arab countries and Neither Pakistan or Afghanistan are Arab countries.

Comment_arrow

Neil Stapley

9:33 am on Tuesday, October 30, 2012

In short both dems and reps have blood on their hands with regards to conflicts that we should never have ever got involved with no doubt David and Steve can pull out sources with regards cover ups and lies surrounding Clinton and Obama. At the end of the day when we try to be the worlds policeman we inevitably get a bloody nose for doing it. It has happened with every world power throughout history. We fail to see the wrong done by those closest to us and point the finger at those we loath.

George Wilson

3:48 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Republican attempts to get traction beyond the realities of this incident have to contend with a president who has unapologetically dispatched Somali pirates, rained drone strikes on Pakistani militants, and sent Osama bin Laden to a better place (for us, at least) with extreme prejudice. More to the point, he did this without subsequent saber rattling bravado and bragging about how terrorists can't hide, and how we'll track them to the ends of the earth, and other rhetorical flourishes that telegraph insecurity rather than strength. Romney and Republicans should have shown some respect to the President.
Romney's opportunistic actions sickened me. May he and Ann never get to unpack their bags in the White House.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sportsfan

4:21 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

George you say that Republican attempts to get traction beyond the realities of this incident". What does that mean exactly? What are the realities of this incident in your world?

Comment_arrow

Sportsfan

5:27 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

He probably believes so. And WHEN our NEW president moves into the White House in January, they won't be unpacking their bags. They have people like George to do that for them. Seeing how nice they are, they will probably send George up early to help the Obama's move back home. You better be careful in Chicago George. The democraps have that city all screwed up and it's dangerous for old people especially.

I would most definitely say that the Benghazi debacle will impact Obama's re-election. It has already impacted the level of fear amongst the liberals.

Comment_arrow

Neil Stapley

4:39 pm on Monday, October 29, 2012

David The President has never once apologized for invading their airspace and has said from before he was even President if it meant targeting militants within Pakistan he will do it and done it he has. His response when asked why he didn't inform the Pakistani government of the mission to get Bin Laden his response was we don't trust them. Secondly the US needed and still does need the supply routes through Pakistan so dropping the big one as you put it kind of leaves us up the (replace the with what ever you please - see Rex I am censoring myself just for you) creek without a paddle.

Mike Chubre

5:29 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

People should not vote for anyone , UNLESS they have facts , not talking points or sound bites . I do not state hear say or nonsense . I do not speak without knowing the facts . The republicans are not interested in the middle class , nor helping them . Anyone of my age should know this. I have seen the republicans years after years look the other way when it comes to the middle class. The reps have refused the prescription drug database for 10 years and fought it every step of the way . A database that could someday save your kids life . The drug dealers love the reps for not enforcing this database . The reps are more interested in supporting the doctors , BIG pharma and their own pocketbook . They passed a watered down version of a database last year that is not mandatory for the doctors to use . They passed it under pressure . Please look into this simple fact before you vote for the reps . This alone should tell you where their heads are at . Its not you and I . Its their wallets and how much they can put in it , regardless of what it does to the middleclass
\

Reply

Tammy Osier

5:57 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

John B. Check this out. it's called "The Unrealities of the Past Four Years". Good read. You'll understand why some can post nonsense and actually believe it.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390443684104578067041987322754.html?mod=djemBestOfTheWeb_h

Reply

Tammy Osier

6:12 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Also, seems, if I remember, it was the Congress that stalled and stalled and stalled until they were out of the country. My family served this country during this war and I was told, 'Oh yeah. They're in Syria". Funny, the same congress (nancy and harry) that gloated that wmd's weren't in Iraq but admit that they are probably in Syria. So, which is it? Here's a pretty credible source:
In 2006, former Iraqi general, Georges Sada, who served under Saddam Hussein before he defected, wrote a book detailing how the Iraqi Revolutionary Guard moved weapons of mass destruction into Syria, before the US-led action...by loading the weapons into civilian aircraft in which the passenger seats were removed.
He says, "If I were Mr. Reid, Ms. Pelosi and the entire compliment of Progressives and anti-war Democrats who cheered in politically opportunistic victory when no “stockpiles” of WMD were found in Iraq, the exact group who routinely ignored those who sounded the alarm about the transfer of WMD from Iraq to Syria, I would be very concerned about what may very well be the ultimate vindication of George W. Bush." He also says, "If the Assad regime decides to use these bio-chemical weapons; if the spent shells are found to possess Iraqi markings of manufacture, anti-war Democrats and Progressives here in the United States will have been complicit in what is tantamount to genocide, and all in pursuit of political gain; all so they could arrogantly chant “Bush lied and people died.”

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steve R.

6:20 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Excellent post Tammy. Thank you and your family for serving our nation.

Neil Stapley

8:52 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

David 1) Afganistan isn't in the Middle East it's actually in Asia 2) Iraq was actually a secular Arab state there were no Islamic militants in Iraq until we invaded and ousted Sadam. Invading Iraq took out what was keeping Iran from doing what they are doing now. The reason why Bush's daddy stopped at the Kuwait border instead of fighting on into Bagsad was for this very reason. We are to blame for the Taliban because we funded them and trainned them to fight the Russians. We are to blame for the resurgence of Iran because we took out their number one enemy an enemy that was no threat to us. The British are to blame for the Isreal/Palestinian issue because they are the ones who shafted the Arabs in the attempt to bring the US into world war 2 by giving the American Jews a sweetener of the their own homeland land that had already been promised to the Arabs.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeff Banks

10:56 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Neil, David, if I may, I feel that you both, myself and others are interested in real facts and I also feel you both have a better understanding than most (certainly better than I) regarding modern history and conflicts around the world. I think it would be great (for me anyway) if we could carry on a calm and civil discussion agreeing when we agree as I learn a great deal from others. I personally find that when I am open minded and listen, I have better success researching those things that matter most to me. If you disagree with my desires here, that's fine but may I ask that you guys pass along any resources to the facts you share? I have a 14 year old Grandson that teaches me things as he is very in tune and interested in politics, world history and how the two have gotten us where we are today. He realizes that his future may undergo major changes from what we have today. I do my best to learn what I can and we share our knowledge. Doing this brings great pleasure to me. He’s a fine fellow. I think we Americans benefit as well from sharing knowledge.

Please consider my request. I see two guys here that have the potential to help a lot of people better understand what we are facing today.

Thank you

Comment_arrow

Neil Stapley

7:31 am on Monday, October 29, 2012

David you and the people like you are the reason why the world is in the mess it is in. You think our current action justify what we do and never ever think about future ramifications of such actions and never look to the past destined to make the same silly mistakes over and over again. The American haters to over in 1970's and were never a problem bar the Emassy debacle and even then the CIA and then incoming Regan camp had their hands in it. Between then and the fall of Sadam Iran and Iraq were always occupyied by their mutual lothing for each other (one being Sunni and the other Shia) google Iran Iraq war. Yes Iraq is full of Muslims but was Iraq ruled by a theocracy no it wasn't. Was there sectarian violence in Iraq prior to the fall of Sadam no there wasn't did Iran have any influence in Iraq prior to the fall of Sadam no they didn't the fall of Sadam create a power vacuum in Iraq a vacuum which Iran took full advantage of. If you want to know the full extent of the stich up that took place around Isreal all you have to do is google Laurence_of_Arabia he was sent in their to win over the arabs so they would join us in fighting against the Ottoman Empire (My appologies this all began in the lead up to the first world war)

Comment_arrow

Neil Stapley

8:05 am on Monday, October 29, 2012

Jeff here are a few links to the points I made

Sykes-Picot Argreement - to carve up the middle east
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sykes-Picot_Agreement

Laurance of Arabia - British Army Colonel T E Laurance
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T._E._Lawrence

Iran Iraq War
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Iraq_War

Shia sunni relations
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shi'a%E2%80%93Sunni_relations

Iran-Contra
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Contra_affair

While its very much the arena of conspiricory theories there are many schools that Regan had completed a deal with the Iran to keep the hostages until after the election thus sealing Jimmy Carters fate.

Through out history back door deals come back to haunt the next generation and fi Jeff wants to believe that Congress had any hand in stopping at the Kuwait border thats his right but the aftermouth of the Second war you can see why they didn't push in further.

Comment_arrow

Neil Stapley

8:36 am on Monday, October 29, 2012

David please note I said there were no islamic militants in Iraq I didnt say there were no Muslims. Turkey is a secular state and that is full or Muslims. The US is full of Christians and we are a secular state. In Iraq under Sadam you were free to practice whatever religion you please you just couldn't disagree with him or you would have quietly disapeared in the middle of the night.

Comment_arrow

Neil Stapley

9:38 am on Monday, October 29, 2012

David he maybe a murdering dictator but he wasn't a murdering dictoror who was any threat to us we should have had no involvement their not 1 single American, British, Canadian, Austrailian, French and whatever country has lost troops for this ongoing ficticous involvement in Middle Eastern/Arabian affairs. Alas if your view of history is through the eyes of Hollywood I pitty your Children and your childrens children as they may grow up believing Abraham Lincoln was a vampire hunter.

Comment_arrow

Neil Stapley

9:55 am on Monday, October 29, 2012

And what did we do when he gassed the Kurds nothing and rightly so its not our problem. Regiem change and messing with the affairs of other countries has and always will come back and bite us in the butt. We are fine dealing with a murderous dictators when it suited our interests funnelling money into them supply weapons, but when that money and those weapons are turned on us we scratch our heads and wonder where the hell it came from.

Jim Aspen

11:23 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Whats one dead Ambassador to Obama

Reply
Comment_arrow

Neil Stapley

8:18 am on Monday, October 29, 2012

As Joeseph pointed out in his post above under Bush their were 42 deaths connected with attacks on US consulates in the Middle East. So whats 42 deaths plus the 1000's of service people that have been killed to Bush.

George Wilson

3:10 pm on Monday, October 29, 2012

@David
It is always good to go back and look at the root causes and history of Iran's' ill feelings towards the United States and other countries in the region as well.

The 1953 Iranian coup d'état was the overthrow of the democratically elected government of Iran, and its head of government Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh on 19 August 1953, orchestrated by the intelligence agencies of the United Kingdom and the United States(CIA) . The coup saw the transition of Mohammad-Rezā Shāh Pahlavi from a constitutional monarch to an authoritarian one who relied heavily on United States support to hold on to power until his own overthrow in February 1979.In 1951, Iran's oil industry was nationalized with near-unanimous support of Iran's parliament in a bill introduced by Mossadegh who led the nationalist parliamentarian faction. Iran's oil had been controlled by the British-owned Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC), now known as BP.Popular discontent with the AIOC began in the late 1940s; a large segment of Iran's public and a number of politicians saw the company as exploitative and a vestige of British imperialism.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rex Smithers

4:16 pm on Monday, October 29, 2012

Yea David, you don't want to forget about that. If you do forget, just go Wiki and read the same thing word for word and you too can copy and paste like George did. AGAIN!

Comment_arrow

Neil Stapley

4:28 pm on Monday, October 29, 2012

Rex maybe George is coping and pasting but he has also gone and done the research to back up his argument which is more than I can say for some on here unless you count the tripe that gets spilled on Fox News as research.

Tammy Osier

7:02 pm on Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Mr. Banks, here's some good research on the subject (where I got the below information). http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/04/saddam_and_alqaeda_1.html
We forget that S. Hussein had connections with Al Qaida. We gained a lot of intelligence after his death. Not only did Saddam provide training and support to terrorists, Saddam readily financed them.
Per the article: at the bottom are cited works that come from other than the internet (which is very unreliable). They come from archived articles from journals. I learned in college that the internet is actually the worst place to find accurate material. But, if you find something with cited works that come from journals, then you have found something you can use.

Reply

Aaron Hunter

9:35 pm on Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Obama has no problem watching a live feed of Americans being butchered in Benghazi. Six weeks later, he tells Hurricane Sandy victims that "We Leave Nobody Behind".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=vqrJPGmBBMA

Obama is a despicable liar!

Reply

Jim Aspen

1:32 am on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Mayor Bloomberg told Obama to stay out of New York City.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Good Grief Y'all

5:43 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Yeah, that's what he said, alright: "New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg said at a news conference Tuesday evening that he declined President Barack Obama’s offer to visit New York City in the midst of Hurricane Sandy’s aftermath, saying that a trip to New Jersey would suffice.

“I talked to the president today and I talked to his chief of staff [Jack Lew] today, particularly about a trip here. What I pointed out to him is that we would love to have him, but we‘ve got lots of things to do,” Bloomberg told reporters. “And I’m not trying to diss him, but I know he had planned a trip to New Jersey, and I said, ‘That’s fine. It represents the whole region; people understand the storm.’

Mayor Bloomberg just endorsed President Obama, 'cause he doesn't want anything to do with him. http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/11/01/14860173-bloomberg-endorses-obama-citing-sandy-and-climate-change?lite

Rex Smithers

4:34 am on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Obama watches live feed of Americans being BUTCHERED in Benghazi. Six weeks later, he tells hurricane victims "We Leave Nobody Behind".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqrJPGmBBMA

DON'T BET ON IT!

Reply

Tammy Osier

6:13 am on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Aaron, Jim and Rex - amen. Now he is banking on this being his katrina. Funny he wants to look presidential now. Such a contrast. Thta's why no one believes him. Good for the mayor.

Reply

Good Grief Y'all

10:28 am on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Ms. Osier and her cheerleaders complain that President Obama has been campaigning - as do all incumbents who seek re-election while serving their elected terms - but today she posts: "Now he is banking on this being his katrina. Funny he wants to look presidential now. Such a contrast. Thta's why no one believes him. Good for… " . . . more right-wing hypocrisy blatantly displayed. He's doing what he was elected to do for the American people. Ask Chris Christie what he thinks about the President's disaster leadership and concern. Mitt Romney fakes a "relief event" that is in reality a political event . . . asking for canned goods when the Red Cross asks for monetary donations, that canned goods, clothes, etc., require more work, time and cost to handle. They need $$, but Romney doesn't want people to spend their money on anything but his campaign.

Reply

Mike Chubre

3:47 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

I did not hear anyone talk about the fact that that seal that was murdered , went in against direct orders not too . He should of known better . Thinking with your heart instead of your brain sometimes gets us in trouble .

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sandy

7:25 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

MIKE Chubre - have you ever served in the US Military? There is really no need for you to answer. Your comments answered my question already.

Mike Chubre

3:49 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Obama is ahead in Ohio . A differant story depending on which channel you watch . Fox Is NOT news , so dont even consider them . They are on the republicans payroll

Reply

Mike Chubre

3:51 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

aspen that remark you made about whats one to Obama ? Thats about stupid my friend . Half wits like you should not be allowed to post your garbage

Reply
Comment_arrow

John B

10:12 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

lol...if Aspen is a half wit you're a quarter...have you read some of your posts?

Tammy Osier

7:05 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Well, good grief, it's funny that you admonish me and then in the same breath make presumptions about Romney (faking a relif effort??) lol - lol. As far as campaigning, when you have national security issues - you stop - and deal with them first. Seems I remember Bush doing just that. Romney is not president - yet. He doesn't have to. Obama is doing now, with the relief effort, what he should have done in bengazi. Maybe that was an expensive lesson learned. He skipped a security briefing that might have cost these men their lives. Then, he cared so much about them, that he went to vegas the next day. These are my opinions, but based on what I've seen him do.
I happen to agree with the father of the navy Seal that died. He said, "It's better to die a hero, than to live as a coward".

Reply
Comment_arrow

Good Grief Y'all

8:09 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Oh, and btw, Romney would do away with FEMA. What a pompous a$$!!

Comment_arrow

Good Grief Y'all

10:33 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

So, Osier, are you the only one who can dispute another's post? I wasn't talking to Romney, I was speaking to you of your ongoing hypocrisy in criticizing the President for campaigning and then mocking him for doing his job, responding to a horrible disaster. You need to take patriotism lessons. You seem to be such an authority on what the President, his cabinet and advisers should or shouldn't do - perhaps you should move to D.C. Do you have an inside connection to the situation room? Even Condi Rice said the President was right in his handling of the matter. Your guy held a press conference before the whereabouts and status of Ambassador Stevens and the others was known, to inject himself politically into a critical national security situation. The families of those lost have asked that their deaths not be politicized. He's a bleeping opportunistic idiot. Small wonder you're a supporter. You're doing the same thing - politicizing human loss to advance your political theories. People like you think the President should be everywhere at once, worldwide. How simplistic.

Comment_arrow

Neil Stapley

1:11 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

DId he, I can recall 2 National Security issues where he didn't. 9/11 he remained sat their as he was told the planes hit the towers reading his book and then Katrina he did nothing as New Orleans was washed away. How long did it take him to fly down to New Orleans and did he step one foot on the ground. Romney went to Ohio (What a surprise) in some fake i am in this with you guys stunt. The red cross had already said look we don't need supplies we need money as transporting and sorting non monetary donations is to time consuming and to expensive. Comparing a murder in Benghazi to a natural disaster is crazy, lets send in the FBI/CIA to see if Sandy was a terrorist action or was the storm some conspiracy by the main stream liberal media. Do you agree with the father of the dead ambassador who is outraged that Romney is trying to politicize his sons murder.

Tammy Osier

7:08 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

MC - they did what they had to do since the government didn't. Had the government sent in reinforcements when asked, they'd ALL be alive today. The government failed on this one. There was NEVER enough security around those men. I have towonder why, when every other president has had more security around our ambassadors than anywhere else. And knowing 911 was coming and they werein the Middle East? Somebody skipped his security briefing to go on a talk show. That's what happened. The ture man is fianlly showing and he's no leader. Bad news is, he will not be analyzed critically since he has his robots all over the US chanting his name as if he were Jim Jones.

Reply

tom munson

7:10 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Obama has been masquerading as a President for four years

Reply

Tammy Osier

7:14 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Tom, I think waht happened on the first debate night is this: For 4 years the media and everyone around him have done his bidding. he hasn't had to do anything- even think (think teleprompter). He has not been challenged (the hard ball questions are given to his opponents only. His propaganda on Romney was sissolved when the public got to see that romney was NOT the villian the obamabots had painted him to be. Then, benghazi. We are seeing the real thing, and it's not pretty.

Reply

Mike Chubre

9:18 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

All these monday morning quarterbacks talking about Libya as if they had all the details? 3/4 of the comments are written by people who know nothing but what Fox socalled news says and we all know that Fox is on the republicans payroll . When in your in the service and given a direct order, you comply . If you dont and it goes wrong , its your as_. Pres Obama , the Harvard grad knows when to be quiet about a situation while all the wannabes run their mouths Do you remember when Bush was in office? Everyone had 4 months notice when he was going to make a move overseas. Just like the birth certificate issue. All the halfwits whining to see it lol Even Donald Trump , who by the way lost the management of one of his own building because of his lack of response to repair issues , maybe he better stick to what he is supposed to know , rather than making false claims about people he is jealous of!! lol .

Reply

Mike Chubre

9:21 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Republicans are making an issue about Libya at this time because they are losing the election and need something to help them turn the tables. Sorry Reps , Americans have your # and its over. Romney flips more than a fish out of water.

Reply

Mike Chubre

9:26 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

The truth is , If Obama walked on water , it would not be enough for the republicans and all their little puppets . Sean Hannity soundslike a broken record regarding Libya . I think hannity is starting to cry as the election gets closer . Face is Hannity , your slick Mitt is sliding

Reply
Comment_arrow

John B

10:09 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Truth is if Obama took a dump in your Cheerios you would swear it was the best cereal you ever ate..........

Mike Chubre

9:30 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

My wifes doctor spend a half hour almost crying that he was going to make the same as he did 5 years ago because of Obama . This is fact. I could not believe my ears that a doctor would act this way ! The doctor went off the deep end . So the doctor will have to settle for the $200.000 a year he nets after ins expenses etc etc . I feel real bad for this doctor !!!! lol lol and thank God for our president Obama

Reply
Comment_arrow

North Georgia Weather

9:09 am on Saturday, November 3, 2012

You are pitiful. You're complaining because a doctor studied for 10-15 years to help people, can't command a decent salary? Who are you to decide what's fair or not?
And you have NO idea how much that doctor makes anyway, you're simply making crap up, much like all of your other post. Read more, post less.

Tammy Osier

9:53 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

On my. Ignorance (and partisanship) abounds. Romeny is NOT doing away with FEMA. He supports it and would give states morepower to use it. Sounds like he wants to eliminate fed control in as many place as polssible. *sigh*

Reply
Comment_arrow

John B

10:10 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

I think the ignorance far outweighs the partisanship..........

Comment_arrow

R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"

10:31 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

If true, (its not) Why not do away with it? Over the last 3 years Homeland Security has been far more involved in all domestic issues than FEMA.

Strengthen FEMA by downsizing Homeland Security or do away with it outright.

Comment_arrow

Good Grief Y'all

10:47 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

It is true that he said it, R. Hard to keep up, I know, because just about everything he has said in the past 18 months he has now reversed. But it's oh so easy to verify everything he has said or written. Don't trust him. Ask Gov. Cuomo and Gov. Christie if they would like to take on FEMA responsibilities. Ask them if they would like to handle the cleanup and reconstruction without federal help. They could give you an expert opinion from current experience. Don't rely on certain Patch posters who claim to know it all. He said it. Romney. That's his position. This is the UNITED States of America. No state or its people should have to go it alone under such circumstances.

Comment_arrow

Sandy

10:53 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Tammy, bless your heart. I have limited time (thank goodness) to read all the crazy things on line. I do know however that you make a special effort to be open minded while listing resources all the while being patient. I will never know how you do it girl but I thank you for your strong will and commitment. We need more soldiers like you.

Ignorance is least of the obvious here in my not so humble opinion. I think that we on both sides believe that our own concept is correct but at what point does common sense come into play?

SINCE WHEN DOES ANYONE SECOND GUESS OUR MILITARY HEROES? Our family and friends give their entire mental and physical lives to a cause in which they volunteer to commit. And during war time? WHEW!

I’m leaving it alone at that, although I have much more on my heart.

God bless you Tammy and God Please Save Our Nation.

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Ryan Smith

12:23 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Rex,
Thanks for the heads-up. And you're right, no one should violate the terms of service. That's regardless of position on the political spectrum. I've deleted a couple comments I spotted that I felt crossed a line. If you see any we missed, hit the flag button and a moderator will be alerted to take a look at it. Thanks for letting me know.

Comment_arrow

Good Grief Y'all

7:30 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

@REX SMITHERS and RYAN SMITH: In my response to Sandy, I was referring to T.O. as being a "military mama" as she has made that statement a number of times on other threads and somewhere in this one I believe, and often speaks of her military knowledge. I was not directing that at Sandy. If someone has reading comprehension issues that's their problem. Racial overtones? WTH is Rex talking about? I did not say anything in the least racial! That statement doesn't even make sense. I'm white, Osier is white, don't know about Sandy. I'm female, Osier is female, don't know about Sandy. No gender slur, either. Ryan, I hope that you will review my comment and see that and make such a clarifying comment. Who's being attacked? I, sir, have been attacked and accused of something so vile that requires another look by you and your moderators, then action taken. That is a highly inflammatory statement by Rex directed at me. Now, Ryan are you going to delete Rex Smithers' post? I am highly offended at Smithers' ridiculous and unwarranted accusation! And, it's okay to call someone "ignorant" because of their opinions? If not, Ryan, you got a whole lot more deletin' to do!

Comment_arrow

Rex Smithers

7:43 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Good Grief Y'all, I deleted my post. My apologies for the error on my part.

Comment_arrow

Good Grief Y'all

9:36 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Apology accepted and appreciated, Rex. Thank you very much!

Mike Chubre

10:33 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Romney said he would make Fema a private company, thats untill he flipped again !!! Romney might be a good salesman , but you better get it in writing if buying from him!!!

Reply

Mike Chubre

10:34 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Fema under Bush you might as well call dial a prayer

Reply
Comment_arrow

Aaron Hunter

11:34 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

And what about our Ambassador and Military in Libya? Who should they have dialed MIKE Chubre? Obama sent Ambassador Chris Stevens and IT Tech Sean Smith to Benghazi with absolutely NO security Personnel. When all went to hell, was "dial a prayer" going to show up with NADS and lend a hand? Obama Sure Did Not!

What do you suggest Obama should have done different MIKE Chubre? Americans are DEAD! Americans are DEAD after Obama's Administration implemented Fast and Furious. What is your answer for that MIKE Chubre?

PLEASE! Certainly you MIKE Chubre with such unlimited knowledge of our Military operations around the globe. Please explain all these unanswered details. OBAMA seems to find it very convenient to block investigations or hide details while he travels the nation campaigning to save his job?

I ask you people: Is this what you expect and demand in our leader of the free world? Have we as Americans not had enough closed door BS without our knowledge? Are we not owed explanations? Do you people give up your FREEDOM that easy?

I choose not to!

http://www.youtube.com/all_comments?v=vqrJPGmBBMA

George Wilson

11:19 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

I have known a lot of politicians in my life, but I have never seen anyone who switches his positions so often as Governor Romney. He exhibits no core values. The astounding and not-so-funny thing is that he gets away with it. (I fully expected to see those "flip-flop" ads with the fish, and I am still puzzled as to why they never materialized.) How could you trust someone like this? Governor Romney is the master of tricks, and the nation will be the recipient if he is elected.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Good Grief Y'all

11:40 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

George, Republicans don't CARE that he lies. They know it. I think they like it. Mr. Etch-a-sketch. But he's really worse than a flip flopper. He's an out and out, unabashed liar. There's evidence of it all over the internet, in print and on video, but his supporters don't care and don't like anyone pointing it out. They actually say his 47% comments were taken out of context! That WAS his context! All of it - in its entirety. His own actual view of "you people". Delusional? Or are they liars, too? It's amazing that people vote against their own best interests. It's horrible what hate causes people to do. And the bad they do, they do to themselves. I have not seen a single comment on Patch from a Republican, right-winger or whatever you call them, that is a true and/or respectful statement about the sitting President of the US. I couldn't stand GWB because of Iraq and a good many other reasons, but I never trashed him.

Comment_arrow

Scott Terry

8:57 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

George, who's flip flopping now?

"We Leave Nobody Behind"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqrJPGmBBMA

Mike Chubre

1:14 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Yes Bush is history, however where were the crys for our men who were sent into Iraq without steel shields on their trucks to protect from them machine fire. It was so bad that our troops had to go to local scrap yards in Iraq to rig their trucks . This rush to war as if Sadamm had his finger on the button . 4 months before going to Iraq we sat watching Iraqi trucks move what could have been wmd to Syria on a daily basis . Sending our troops as open targets for what? I could write a book on all the other examples of non leadership . Please , It was not Obamas call to send in anybody , thats the states dept job . We dont know all the facts on this one yet . Time will tell who did what. So why dont you Obama haters find another excuse to try and get rid of him

Reply

Mike Chubre

1:20 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

What better endorsement could Obama get other than Colin Powell s ?? He would never endorse anyone but the best . And the other rep sen from some backwoods place had the nerve to say he endorsed him because he was black !!!! This sen should be retired 10 years ago .

Reply

Mike Chubre

1:25 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

The one and only reason we seem to have a handful of rightwing people talking about Libya is because its election time. Any other time I bet most of these right wingers never pick up a paper to read . They get all their LOL LOL " FACTS " LOL LOL from some blowhard Hannity on so called Fox "News " You know ? the station thats on the republicans payroll

Reply
Comment_arrow

Scott Terry

8:56 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

MIKE Chubre, "The one and only reason"? Really? How about Americans deserve the facts? Obama now covering up at least two big incidents including Fast and Furious and now Benghazi. It is appalling that people like find Obama's actions on American murders, acceptable. Would you feel the same if it was Father that was murdered or your son?

"We Leave Nobody Behind"
http://www.youtube.com/all_comments?v=vqrJPGmBBMA

Comment_arrow

John B

10:53 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Mr. Chubby...the reason a lot of people are talking about Benghazi is because of the lying crap below....Not Hannity, Not O'Reilly, Not FOX. Sorry to see your head is so far up your tailpipe you're blind.

"And that is what we saw play out in the last two weeks, where a crude and disgusting video sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world. Now, I have made it clear that the United States government had nothing to do with this video, and I believe its message must be rejected by all who respect our common humanity. It is an insult not only to Muslims, but to America as well." " We understand why people take offense to this video because millions of our citizens are among them. I know there are some who ask why don't we just ban such a video. The answer is enshrined in our laws. Our Constitution protects the right to practice free speech." "There are no words that excuse the killing of innocents. There is no video that justifies an attack on an embassy." "The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam. Yet to be credible, those who condemn that slander must also condemn the hate we see when the image of Jesus Christ is desecrated, churches are destroyed, or the Holocaust is denied."

Comment_arrow

Good Grief Y'all

2:34 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

John B, you're name-calling. I believe that's against the Patch rules. Oh, RYAN!? Aside from that, what's your point? What lying "crap"? I didn't check word-for-word your quotation against the President's actual words, but on the surface it looks right. What is it that's either lying or crap? I especially like the last sentence, don't you? So, what's your point? Nevermind answering. Mine is a rhetorical question. That video had already sparked protests and terrorism in the region before Benghazi. Making that connection was no stretch of the imagination. And, btw, I believe a full and finished investigation will indeed show that the hate video and the terrorists using that as opportunity will prove to be the case. In fact, I think that much info came out before the 2nd debate - you know the one - where Romney had egg all over his smirking face. Or was that the 3rd debate in which the President could have made that known? So many facts, so many details. :D

Comment_arrow

John B

2:50 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

What name calling Mr. Grief are you talking about?
Hopefully you haven't reproduced because if you have I'm sure your kids have lied to you many times as you are an easy target....so gullible. Please don't leave your house. It's too dangerous for you.

Comment_arrow

Good Grief Y'all

4:29 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

John B. What you called MIKE was not nice. I'm a Mrs. You call me gullible because I called you out on your bs. I call it insightful.

Comment_arrow

John B

5:57 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

You're right...not gullible...naive is probably better. Called me out? Laughable...don't you have a fictitious war on women battle to fight....why are you here?

Comment_arrow

Good Grief Y'all

7:41 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

John B. I'm neither gullible, naive or misinformed. Many who post here are misguided, misinformed and some are mean-spirited. Honestly, I'm here because in viewing a Patch email I came across a comment on the "Opinion" feature that pulled me into this political boiling cauldron. (Huh, it was on Halloween come to think of it.) One of your prolific regular posters made a typical hypocritical statement. No surprise there, but it just hit me wrong at the time. I don't like anything that person has to say, obnoxious is a good word for it, so I try my damnedest to always scroll on past. Sometimes it's just wise to ignore and move along. I have stayed away from this political scrapping but that did pull me in, regretfully. You know how it is, one comment leads to another, others pick at you, you answer and soon you're in a back-and-forth you didn't want or need. Kinda of like the proverbial train wreck that you know you shouldn't look at because it will make you sick, but you do it anyway. That particular person's posts have such an effect on me. Now, some of the class clown types with their one-liners and zingers don't bother me so much. Except when they get vulgar or bully, name-calling - that sort of thing. Thanks for asking because I know you really care ;) Oh, btw - that war on women thing? It's real.

Mike Chubre

1:49 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

George Wilson , You have explained it well, thank you . I believe Obama will win. HOWEVER I think the electoral college will play games with this . We thought we saw a fight with Gore/ Bush ? Wait untill Obama/ Romney start !!! We could sell tickets to this one . I thought an election worker in west palm with a dinner plate size magnify glass looking at a half removed chad was unprofessional and silly.

Reply

Mary Lou

8:29 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

In handing Fema monies BACK to the states is really strengthening the monies in of itself as thats what its about to begin with. All these states send monie every year to FEMA. The when a disaster or need comes along, the disaster is called as just that..a disaster, so that FEMA can then hand that state, their own monies back they sent to them. I think thats a great idea for each state to keep up with their own monies as it would cut out an extra step necessary, just to receive those needed monies back. Handled on a state level makes more sense as it knows its people/residents, needs and neighborhoods much better than at a federal level. Romney never said do away with it, if people understood how t worked, would know what he said translates into a quicker response time to those in need, and better distribution of needed funds.

Reply

Mary Lou

8:31 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

and further regarding FEMA- wasnt there some absurd waste of monies and questionable actions in katrina when they gave people health hazard trailers? moldy trailers or something?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Good Grief Y'all

10:15 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

FEMA under GWB and "You're doing a heck of a job" Brownie. Trailers as temporary housing for storm victims, a good solution. Toxic trailers as temporary housing for storm victims or anyone, a very bad solution. Somebody in that era dropped the ball on safety and quality, no doubt. But you don't throw the baby out with the bath water.

Good Grief Y'all

10:00 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Too many states can't handle routine needs, so certainly not disasters of the magnitude of Hurricane-Super Storm Sandy or Katrina; some can't be trusted to use money as intended and directed. Many states have state constitutions mandating a balanced budget, so they "balance" the budget by moving money around, taking and using funds meant for other important and necessary programs, raising fees and licensing (but mustn't call those increases taxes), like Romney did as governor of Mass. The experts on who should handle FEMA funds are the victims of natural and man-made disasters. All the rest are just pontificating. Making political word salads.

Reply

Mary Lou

10:22 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

@Good Grief Y'all- seriously? and the feds have shown some stellar performance? *baffled* yes- state level is closer to giving the people back their rights and powers, as should be.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Good Grief Y'all

2:01 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Yes, Mary Lou - seriously! There are some very backward states in the US. Look at their voter suppression laws, their turning back time on women's issues, their poor performance on education. Very seriously!

Karsten Torch

10:30 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

"The experts on who should handle FEMA funds are the victims of natural and man-made disasters."

Huh? So the people that should handle welfare are those that are on the receiving end of it, too? I'm really not following this statement.

And we need to handle the states' money because they're incapable of being trusted with their own money? Well, it's a good thing we have the federal government, then, who would NEVER EVER mis-allocate funds. Ever. They can surely be trusted to keep the FEMA money in a separate account, ready to be used in emergencies. I mean, why trust the states to handle things? Of course, not having the states handle their own emergency money means they will never learn how, they can keep squandering money in other places. Me thinks you don't give them enough credit. Oh, and the states are supposed to be mostly autonomous. The federal government isn't supposed to get involved in a majority of the things they currently do.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Good Grief Y'all

2:16 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Reading comprehension problems, Karsten? Did I say ANYTHING about welfare? The subject is disaster relief. By victims, I'm including the people living in and those visiting disaster areas (NY has lots of tourists), plus the elected officials (also victims) who must lead the way back to near, then complete normalcy and reconstruction. The people who elected them should trust (but oversee) the coordination with FEMA. I'm not saying states can't have their own emergency funds, but federal monies belong to all the states to be used when and where needed. The insurance industry has to pay up, too, don't forget. Do you think the disaster in the NY area might have some negative impact on the rest of America? The economy? How many flights had to be canceled? How many people outside of the disaster areas have been affected, how many people in other states have loved ones in the affected states? Some states get it right. Some states don't. Florida's governor? Me thinks you give people like him too much credit and trust. Then there are a lot of the square states with creepy or corrupt officials. It's the UNITED States of America. One for all and all for one. The original 13 colonies decided that. Must we still be fighting the Civil War? The federal govt. isn't involved in a majority of states' business, but the states' citizens are American citizens, remember?

Mary Lou

10:37 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

@ Good grief- I was also correcting your post: Good Grief Y'all

8:09 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Oh, and btw, Romney would do away with FEMA. What a pompous a$$!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Romney wasn't saying to "do away" with FEMA as in nothing left in place for the people during times of a disaster. in your posting, it was skewed and completely taken out of context, as well as leaving out the other parts of it, such as delegating responsibilities at the state level versus federal level. States are better in tune to their own residents needs. Also freeing up time for a quicker response financially.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Good Grief Y'all

2:45 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Don't trouble yourself to correct me, Mary Lou. And, oh yes, he was. Look it up. Why hasn't he answered reporters' questions on the subject? He's a tax dodger and a question dodger. Out of context? You guys have the market cornered on that troubling tactic. Who welcomed direct communication and a visit from the President? Oh, yeah, NJ Gov.Christie. I think he knows a little bit more about the system and the situation than you do. When major cities are in the midst of power outages, their transportation systems, roadways underwater, buildings floating away and many on fire, you think the locals can go it alone? That's dangerously naive.

Comment_arrow

Mary Lou

2:58 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

@good grief- I am struggling to keep up with your posts back to me in the fact that you keep throwing these assumptions and general statements at me. A little help with more specifics might shore that up. Again, I will ask you- Look up what? what questions were dodged? "you guys" who are you talking about here? of coarse the Gov welcome the pres, that's what he is suppose to do, however, new york ironically told him stay away. All the prez did for Gov Christie, was basically hand him back the monies the state of NJ ALREADY sent to FEMA. Are you understanding the system and how it works? HE GAVE HIM BACK THEIR OWN MONEY THAT WAS PREVIOUS SENT/PAID to FEMA. Nothing out of the way or sacrificial. If their monies were not being held captive by FEMA, the Gov would have been available to immed go to work rolling up sleeves and getting to restoring the communities to whole again. Are you thinking that without FEMA holding states monies captive, there wouldn't be any? it is you my friend that I think it dangerously naive. ~shrugs~

Comment_arrow

Good Grief Y'all

3:43 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Mary Lou, look up the subject of the questions you're posing to me. You know how to use Google or Bing, Snopes? They're your questions, not mine. I made no general assumptions or statements. Re-read your own retyping of my statement about Romney regarding FEMA. He stated on tape in the primary debates that he would do away with FEMA. He dodged questions from reporters that he made that statement about FEMA - 11 times on the day of his "disaster relief" event he dodged reporters on his FEMA stance. If that's his position, why wouldn't he answer their questions? Put it to rest. He's a coward - afraid of his own varying positions on numerous topics. "You guys" would be your side of the political fence - Republicans, conservatives (I don't think radical, extremist ideas are conservative), right-wing guys. I don't see why I had to define that for you, based on your stated positions. As to the rest of your FEMA statements, and states monies, see my comments to Karsten. Let's move on. Stalemate. I'm not going to continue explaining this stuff to you. Reread, have someone help you or just move on. Ignore me. You have my full permission. I promise I won't be offended. :)

Mary Lou

2:06 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

@Good Grief Y'all

2:01 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Yes, Mary Lou - seriously! There are some very backward states in the US. Look at their voter suppression laws, their turning back time on women's issues, their poor performance on education. Very seriously!
_________________________________________________________________
We WERE initially speaking of FEMA money but now somehow were off on these other topics. Could you please provide some specific, direct, and recent examples of what your talking about? entirely too vague to understand your point/point. What voter supression? what time has been turned back on specifically what women's issues? and what poor performance specifically on education?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Good Grief Y'all

3:05 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

If you will notice, in comments and replies, posters often expound on their views and illustrate, connect different issues. I was responding to Karsten, who brought in welfare and promoted his belief in the efficiency of states handling all their issues, including disaster and emergency actions, as you yourself have done, no need for federal help he says. Ask him why he introduced those topics. Really? You have not been keeping up with all the reports of voter suppression laws - voter id for people who have voted for decades and who may have limited access and money to obtain them, cutting early voting days and hours and the number of precincts in disadvantaged districts,not cutting in affluent areas, disruption of funds and stringent licensing requirements to Planned Parenthood facilities and anti-abortion laws passed since 2010 in 30 something state legislatures, and also in the US House of Representatives, personhood amendments - all the tricky riders they have placed on their time wasting, stalling bill activity? You've never heard of the vaginal probe bill in VA? Continued below . . .

Good Grief Y'all

3:15 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Continued . . . or the bills in various states and Congress to curtail birth control access? It's not my job to educate you or any other low information voters. If you can post on Patch, you can do your own research, but I did give you a start.
S c a r y that you're even asking about those issues. Oh, wait, you're into Fox, aren't you? Broaden your horizons. I rest my case on the education issue. See that example in many of the comments above. But the 2010 mid-term Congressional elections were supposed to be all about JOBS-JOBS-JOBS. What do those TPers do when they got their hands on the nation's business? Started up with the Planned Parenthood defunding stuff, changing abortion laws, named Post Offices . . . etc., etc., etc. There, does that get you started on the road to understanding why the Republican agenda is so bad for America? Nah, probably not. My daddy used to say there are people who would argue with a signboard.

Reply

Mary Lou

3:18 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

@good grief- I dont see voter ID as a suppression I think it is good and actually ensures a better chance of honesty, no matter which party you vote for. I dont know anyone that doesn't already have some sort of ID . It is not some absurd, massive, and unreachable goal to require one to have an ID for voting or any other purpose. ABORTION IS NOT GOING ANYWHERE. I wish people could let that one rest. Personally, sad, and wouldn't be my choice, but again, is another scare tactic. I believe most of the riders are trying to block public funding for abortion, and am OK with that. Why should someone who vehemently oppose something even based on their own religious beliefs, be forced to pay for something on behalf of someone else? The states handling their own disaster money to better serve their own states residents rather than the feds doing it(again- point to Katrina here on record-delays and moldy trailers) has somehow led to all these other issues?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Good Grief Y'all

3:32 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Mary Lou -voter id laws should not affect the ability of anyone to vote. That's what I'm talking about. Yes, it is suppression. If voter id is required, states should provide free of cost to the voter and allow adequate time to finish the process - not do it in a national election year. Not everyone drives or has picture id. States should issue proper voter id where those laws are inacted - well ahead of elections. And, yes, it is a very big undertaking. There is no public funding for abortions. It is specifically outlawed in Obamacare - ACA. I'm not pro-abortion. I'm for letting the person with her doctor make the decisions that affect her and not after the first trimester except when the life of the mother is the issue. You think actual legislation and bills introduced into Congress are scare tactics? Those are reality. I have answered your other points, about the trailers and FEMA. We don't agree. Period. That's cool with me.

Mary Lou

3:26 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

@goodgrief- I think your too far gone down the rabbit hole..My condolences. I was trying to have a reasonable convo, being you replied to MY comments but carry on "birds chirping" into Fox? fox what? I would think my horizons are fairly broadened as I dont stay limited on one issue in seeing things one way across the board. Pretty diverse person I am. If your not happy with the education for your kids, you do have multiple choices there. Your not bound to a public, government, federal, etc..system. There is private(that's what we chose) and home schooling as well. No one is taking any rights away from you. I am not a republican, I am an independent voter(record) and vote agenda every election. Would love to see another party added to the choices. What are TPers? you lost me again.

Reply

Mike Chubre

3:53 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Why are all these monday morning quarterbacks harping on the Libya issue as if they had all the facts? The only ones with the facts are in the oval office and they may still be waiting on the rest of it. Why dont you all admit your Romney is losing and he is trying to hang on anyway he can . Using Libya to help him win is wrong . But Romney doesnt not care , he will do whatever to move into the whitehouse . God help us all if that happens.

Reply

Good Grief Y'all

3:55 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Oh, my, Mary Lou. I believe you're beyond talking to. First, I don't need your corrections or your condolences. Don't play dumb, you know I was talking about Fox News Channel. Otherwise you wouldn't be saying chirping. I know you've been on these threads enough to know what I mean. This exchange ain't your first rodeo. I'm quite happy with my children's education - they have advanced degrees and very good paying jobs. After all that explanation at your behest, you think I was talking about my own situation? Perfect example of what I meant about naivety and being a low information voter. TPers - short for Tea Party people, but you knew that, didn't you?. Home schooling by parents who probably didn't get very well schooled themselves? That's a whole 'nother topic I'll leave to others. You sure sound like a Republican, undeclared (ashamed to), maybe?

Reply

Mike Chubre

3:58 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Now we have republicans condemning Christie for saying what a great Job Obama is doing . Why should I be alarmed at that? GO FIGURE Just like the last 4 years the reps have done everything they could to hinder Obama and all his efforts .

Reply

Mary Lou

4:47 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

@good grief- birds chirping has been around for longer than a news channel I would assume.I am not a fox follower. If I were republican, I wouldn't be ashamed, just as I wouldn't if I were a democrat. if I am going to stand for something, I am not going to be ashamed. I dont have to defend my voting record to you, but challenge away. I think you misrepresented much of your point as I truly was at a loss trying to follow you on them in your being vague. You mentioned abortion/education/voter suppression and such, I kindly responded to those points with my opinion as you did yours. I was merely pointing out, abortion is going no where, so it is often used as a scare tactic to get people to worry their rights are somehow being threatened, when they are not. Again, you have to have an ID in this country to do just about anything- bank, drive, write a check- apply for job-apply for a benefit- rent a car-hotel- the list is endless. you'd be hard pressed to find someone who lives so far under a rock they dont have an ID so therefore they are being denied their right to vote. Wasn't this an issue already going on years ago? as in plenty of time to prepare for the election if it was going to be necessary and they wanted to vote? lets be reasonable here.Cont'

Reply

Mary Lou

4:47 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

cont'@good grief- As for your children and education, again, you threw out a blanket statement ,could only gather you were referring to your own situation you were disgruntled with. My point is there are many opportunities if one (whomever that ONE is) to educate their children outside of a public setting if they were not happy with the Government. No one is being denied/suppressed from anything. I think you could have gotten that much from my posts, but really, I think you were just looking to pick a blog argument. Kudos. Ta Ta

Reply
Comment_arrow

Good Grief Y'all

5:31 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Mary Lou, twice you copied and pasted my comment: "Yes, Mary Lou - seriously! There are some very backward states in the US. Look at their voter suppression laws, their turning back time on women's issues, their poor performance on education. Very seriously!" Do you still insist that you thought I was talking about my own children's education? On voter id comments, unfortunately there are a lot of people in this country who live about as bad as "under a rock" with no bank account, no money to rent a car for travel or business, etc., poor and unwashed they may be, but they still have a right to vote. Shocker alert: some people don't even have a birth certificate but were born here, have worked and earned SS benefits, Medicare and have legally voted for decades. You, Mary Lou, were the one who first made a comment to my statement about Romney's position on FEMA, not the other way around. Thus, you're the one picking a blog argument. I was being courteous enough to respond to your direct comments to me. Sheesh! I can't tell if you're really so innocent here or you truly have reading comprehension problems. That would be an excellent public service for Patch to undertake - get these folks some reading lessons! You're not the only one who seems to need help that way.

Brian Clark

5:07 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

I think if Obama wins they will simply impeach him over the lying like they did Nixon... Then unfortunately Biden will have to lead the country.. so vote for Romney... He has already won Georgia it is better to get any friends in Ohio WS Co NC FL and Iowas to vote for Romney.... They will go after an impeachment if he wins and I don't see why they would not get it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris

6:38 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Brian, you say "I think if Obama wins they will simply impeach him over the lying like they did Nixon".

Never going to happen. Not if, but when Obama wins next week, there will be no more “THEY”. Remember Obama saying this to the enemy?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jOcuqyTef4

Here Obama leans over to the Russian President, Dmitry Medvedev and says "after my election I have more flexibility". What does he mean? Why hasn't he been questioned by the media or in a debate regarding this claim?

If Obama will make promises to the enemy of the United States, why would he let himself be held accountable to us weaklings? Look at what Obama has done with Fast and Furious. He put a stop to the investigation. WHY? I think WHY is a damn good question. When the great unwashed votes Obama in for a second RULE, that is exactly what he intends to do. Obama has no intention of answering to anyone. He will spend his second rule, full speed ahead "Transforming the United States of America" into his dream, equal playing field.

Get used to it.

Mike Chubre

6:32 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Impeach Obama ??? lol lol lol lol You guys just hate a winner !!! He may get a medal. Like I said, if Obama parted the red sea or walked on water , you would find fault with him . I just dont understand why anyone would condemn a man who saved millions of peoples homes from the blood sucking banks and gave health care to all . Makes no sense why anyone would vote for Romney over Obama . I would vote for any man or woman who had to work his way up the ladder and knows what it is to struggle . Unlike Romney who was born with the siver spoon in his mouth . Romney has no respect for the working man or woman

Reply
Comment_arrow

John B

7:10 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Mike:
As Obama is the incumbent please tell me why this election is so close. If his record warrants a landslide why is it that his approval rating is below 50%? Is it just because half the population is haters? Remember, many voted for him in 2008 that won't vote for him in 2012. What's your thoughts?

Mike Chubre

8:10 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

If anyone one of us had to speak to the president over a serious matter , which one would you think might get your ear? If Romney was elected you would not get the time of day , unless you had something for his wallet

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris

10:47 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Well MIKE Chubre, honestly, to answer your question. It seems to me that if anyone should have gotten your president's ear "over a serious matter" it should have been Chris Stevens when he asked for Security Personnel in Libya. He more than likely requested security personnel due to the fact that he HAD NONE! -- As In ZERO SECURITY !!!

Apparently Obama would not give the "time of day" to Chris Stevens and Sean Smith (AMERICANS). I would never spew babble such as Obama needed "something for his wallet". That is lunacy. I do however, as do many Americans, feel that Obama owes an explanation after 7 1/2 weeks regarding details about this TERRORIST ATTACK. Obama said himself that he would share details as they were received. MIKE Chubre, do you feel that Obama has not received any information? Is this why he hasn’t shared any information as he promised to? Certainly a honorable President “who saved millions of peoples homes and gave health care to all” would be a President with honor and live up to his promises. RIGHT MIKE Chubre? Transparency and stuff ???

What say you MIKE Chubre?

Comment_arrow

North Georgia Weather

9:33 am on Saturday, November 3, 2012

You make the most ridicules statements, with no factual basis at all. How is it you have all the facts and knowledge? Why are your news sources the only credible ones? And based on all the post here, why are liberals so hateful?

Comment_arrow

Good Grief Y'all

4:05 pm on Saturday, November 3, 2012

NGW, have you truly read the R side posts? I find your comment astonishing. Really, you don't see the mean spirited, name calling, bully-style comments? Guess it's all in one's perspective. Have you got Mitt up there on that weather vane with you?

Jim Aspen

10:46 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Is Hurricane Sandy likely to impact the Presidents reelection efforts.

Nothing will interfere with the reelection efforts of Obama, nothing. Not a dead Ambassador nor the East Coast effects of Sandy.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris

10:56 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Mr. Aspen, thank you for your efforts. We are doing our part.

"We Leave Nobody Behind"
http://realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/10/30/obama_we_leave_nobody_behind.html

Mike Chubre

11:58 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Chris. Whatever happened at the embassy is not going to change the election at all. Yes you might have a few uninformed voters make a vote based on this issue. The order for help would of went to the sec of state " hillary" . Obama might not have made the call on this as I believe it would be Hillarys job to make . If things were that bad in the weeks before stevens was murdered , why on earth did he stay ? Does anyone really believe that Obama would of just looked the other way ? That is nonsense and just like blowhard Hannity on Fox Blues , anyone who believed that is whacked and most likley a republican looking to help Romney win. Please remember , it was the republicans who cut the budget for security at the embassey.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris

12:22 am on Friday, November 2, 2012

MIKE Chubre, please just try to be civil for a few minutes and answer my questions.

I didn't mention anything about the election. Do you not feel that your parents, you, your children and your fellow Americans deserve to hear from our President when he makes such promises to share information that we damn sure have a right to have?

PLEASE! Just answer my questions with honesty and integrity. You are my fellow American. I know you have it in you.

Mike Chubre

12:04 am on Friday, November 2, 2012

I have never seen in all my years watching our government , so many people condemn " our" president of the "United" States !! I tottally blame the republicans for this . The republicans had to scrap the bottom of the gutter to come up with a person to run . Does everyone know the history behind gov Scott?? How did this man ever get elected? And for the reps to back this man tells me all I need to know .

Reply

Mike Chubre

12:11 am on Friday, November 2, 2012

Before the reps picked Ryan as vp , they were kicking around Sen Rubio ? Sen Rubio helped judge hawkes build the taj mahal , the new courthouse. Judge Hawkes had to resign over the corruption involved with this and left before the surpreme court jailed them all . 50 million dollars to build , when Florida had a shortfall in the budget and Rubio walks away without a word ??????? Why doesnt Fox Blues , I mean news, question rubio on this? Fox picks their battles and its always the dems . They were thinking of Rubio as vp because the reps dont have anyone left that can past the smell test . Sen Rubio would not pass either.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris

12:34 am on Friday, November 2, 2012

JIM... Please try to keep up here. Obama said himself..."We Leave Nobody Behind".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqrJPGmBBMA

Obama saved millions of peoples homes and gave health care to all! Good God man! What part of these blessings from Obama are you missing Mr. Aspen?

Dumpster diving? Really? That will last all of about... maybe three weeks? What's the big deal? One hasn't experienced Obama's blessing until he eats Diesel fuel soaked feces. Mr. Aspen, I just ask that you try to be patient and understand that recovery takes time. I heard on FAUX NEWS just the other day that these people may be without power for 5 to 7 days. Of course I'm thinking more like two weeks at least for most.

Seriously, I think we as Americans have it in us to feel for our fellow man. These tragedies are always horrific and heartbreaking to see. It is however more sickening to watch Obama give FALSE HOPE and CHANGE to these people so he can rule another term to finish what he started. What a putrid SACK he is!

Mike Chubre

12:30 am on Friday, November 2, 2012

Aspen What a comment ! Those dumpster divers are regulars . Obama is getting on some republicans butts that are slacking in this situation, just like the reps did for 4 years trying to make Obama look bad . You people are starting to make me sick . You are standing up for republicans who dont care one bit about the working person . IF YOU DONT LIKE THE FACT THAT OBAMA IS BLACK JUST SAY IT AND STOP WITH THE BS

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris

1:09 am on Friday, November 2, 2012

REGULARS? HA HA HA!

Are you kidding us MIKE Chubre? You just got done telling us how great your president is at saving the world and now you say he missed these losers because they are regulars at the Dumpster dinner tables?

YOU SAID - "Obama saved millions of peoples homes and gave health care to all". REALLY? health care TO ALL? Does ALL exclude these regular dumpster divers MIKE Chubre?

I am sorry MIKE Chubre but you are going to have to stand one way or the other. Is your Obama King the savior to all or just the few who you choose worthy?

I just don't see it. Obama has done nothing for me and my family but cost us more money. Is it my fault and the fault of my family that we choose to be self-dependent and not steal from others so we can have cell phones, steak dinners and Alcohol?

My family works and we pay our own way in life. We always have and we always will. We Do Not Make Excuses And We Do Not Expect Our Fellow American O pay Our Way!

PERIOD! By the way... We are regulars at doing this! Damn Proud OF It Too!

OH... so we are now back to the end of the rope again. We are all racists because we disagree with Obama.

Thank you MIKE Chubre. You just proved my whole point here tonight. I love it when you guys are so easy. : )

Have a good night.

Comment_arrow

Robert

1:38 am on Friday, November 2, 2012

MIKE Chubre - I came home from work around 12:00 this morning and I spent about 30 minutes reading this thread. I find your comments a bit bizarre. You seem to be all over the map with your claims and accusations with little or no real factual information. I must admit that I find your input interesting. You make claims from one extreme to the other. Some of which seem to offer a concept of self-contradiction. Perhaps you may take some time to review your input and evaluate you true feelings about one matter or another.

In my field, I often cross paths with others who are confused or not sure what they believe. It is perfectly understandable with the lives we lead today. My concern however is that we work together to understand how to co-exist and behave in harmony together.

I feel that you have a strong conviction and trust for Barack Obama. This is admirable. We all have those of which we look up to, or at least we should. I do however notice you are sensitive to criticism when it comes to Obama. Might I please suggest that that you refrain from retaliation to every criticism and especially be careful while accusing others of not liking the President because he is black?

At this point in time, if America hasn’t proven to the world that we look past skin color to elect our President, we never will. I only ask that you take the time to choose your battle lines.

Being patient is a favorable trait. Just my two.

Mike Chubre

2:45 am on Friday, November 2, 2012

Robert , It does not matter if you believe this or not. I have never brought up anyones race at anytime untill one republican sen last week said that Colin Powell picked Obama because he was black . This got me going . However I have never heard so much noise out of the reps about Obama that is total nonsense . These people cannot have that much against Obama like they say , this leds me to believe its his race . No one with half a brain is going to condemn a man who has his back and in my opinion really wants to help others , no matter if they are rich or poor . I dont agree with all of Obama , but I know he is not supporting the drug dealers on the streets with prescription drugs . This is my main issue with the republicans. This is a deal breaker. 10 years fighting against the prescription drug database , therefor prescription drugs are killing our kids. By the way ,I dont make comments I cannot support . What I say is after years of research . Is your real name bob newhart ? you know the shrink from that show? lo lol

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sandy

5:55 am on Friday, November 2, 2012

Very mature! Where did you learn to write?

I don't like O at all and it has nothing to do with him being half white.

Comment_arrow

OICUR12

6:03 am on Friday, November 2, 2012

MIKE, you do realize that your first name is all cap........Never mind

LOL

Tammy Osier

6:14 am on Friday, November 2, 2012

Sandy - I'm sooooo done with this thread. There's a good question started close by on whether we should do away with electoral college. Why don't you come over there? It's a good question and needs some intelligent thinkers besides karsten and me. :)

Reply
Comment_arrow

Good Grief Y'all

6:59 am on Friday, November 2, 2012

Yeah, Sandy, we definitely need some intelligent thinkers and writers on all blog threads. Like me :D Come on over George Wilson, Brian Crawford, Neil Stapley and Amy. Jeff Banks can moderate. And please, when you move over there, leave the sideswiping and snark here.

Comment_arrow

Good Grief Y'all

9:10 am on Friday, November 2, 2012

Just to clarify, b/c I sure don't want to offend like minds, my comment about sideswiping and snark was meant for the Rs, "conservatives", where it's most prevalent. Bet we could have a more civilized discussion without the s & s.

Comment_arrow

Good Grief Y'all

7:30 pm on Saturday, November 3, 2012

Oopsy, think I misread Jeff Banks. Not moderator material after all, probably, in my opinion.

Comment_arrow

John B

8:37 pm on Saturday, November 3, 2012

self absorbed people are known to misread things..........

Mike Chubre

7:55 am on Friday, November 2, 2012

Sandy duhhhhhhhhhhhhh geeeeeee wizzzzzzzzzzz BIG DEAL

Reply
Comment_arrow

Harriet

8:03 am on Friday, November 2, 2012

Yep. Very mature and intelligent.

Are you skipping school today MIKE in all caps?

Mike Chubre

8:13 am on Friday, November 2, 2012

Iam very sorry that someone had to point out my caps . I find it sad that this bothered them enough to make a comment . I guess this means Iam yelling

Reply

Mike Chubre

8:18 am on Friday, November 2, 2012

My caps are fixed . Dont want to keep you awake at night

Reply
Comment_arrow

Harriet

8:31 am on Friday, November 2, 2012

You appear to be the only one posting at 3:00am.

Good Grief Y'all

9:16 am on Friday, November 2, 2012

Wow, lots of dissing in here on senior citizens and children. Who's immature?

Reply
Comment_arrow

John B

8:22 am on Saturday, November 3, 2012

you...only second to Mr. Chubby....how's that war on women battle going? Or is it a war with other women because it surely doesn't look like you're gaining traction with your own gender in these blogs....

Comment_arrow

Good Grief Y'all

8:41 am on Saturday, November 3, 2012

John B - again, you display your immaturity amidst the other name callers. Unfortunately, many of the women in GA are caught up in their man's politics and have a 1950s mentality. Any woman who votes Republican is either in the upper 1% or a low/mis-informed voter. Some of the "women" on these threads may not even be women - hard to tell by the way they write, just posers. haha! I'm not trying to win any war or popularity contest here, and I'm not trying to change anyone's mind. I do seem to have a taken on a couple of stalkers in just the few days I've been posting. I must be saying something that gets to them, and that makes it worth my time. Patch is overrun with R crapola. I'm just giving folks some variety. I consider it my public service duty ;) You have a fantastic weekend, John B.

Comment_arrow

NY Dumpster Diver

8:43 am on Saturday, November 3, 2012

For the record, I don't have any problem with lesbians.

Sportsfan

9:27 am on Friday, November 2, 2012

I saw Geraldo Rivera on TV this morning and I thought he was going to cry. He's an emotional man ya know. He is upset that people are bum rushing Obama about the Benghazi murders. He apparently feels that Obama is doing everything in Las veg....
I mean everything in his power to be transparent and share the information as it comes in just as he promised. This Tuesday will be EIGHT WEEKS! Apparently Obama is just as much in the dark about this Terrorist Attack as the 320,000,000 Americans that he works for.

"We Leave Nobody Behind"
http://realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/10/30/obama_we_leave_nobody_behind.html

Reply

Mike Chubre

9:39 am on Friday, November 2, 2012

Get off the Benghazi murders already . Its not going to help your man Romney win , and I know this is the agenda behind all the talk about Benghazi

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sportsfan

8:37 am on Saturday, November 3, 2012

MIKE Chubby, Please Take Note Of The Thread Title.

Government school much?

Mike Chubre

9:43 am on Friday, November 2, 2012

Bush allowed the Bin Laden Family to fly out of the USA on 9-11 The only plane in our skies!!! This and many many many more issuess that the reps commited . Where was the out cry then? Oh It was not election time

Reply

Mike Chubre

10:26 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012

Can you all believe Hannity on Fox Blues is still crying about Libya ? He has gone through 20 boxes of Kleenex this week alone . Maybe Hannity better take a week off as his ranting is not changing the election one bit. Hannity is at his wits end and I find it very odd that he believes the libya issue would change voters minds without all the facts . HE MUST THINK THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE STUPID ?? Sorry Hannity its not working like you thought . You have a few days left, better rant on something else

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris

10:48 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012

If Obama loses, would you then concede that the hell raising about way Benghazi is being handled, helped change minds?

You say that "HE MUST THINK THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE STUPID ??" You don't think that we have stupid AMERICAN PEOPLE who vote?

Good Grief Y'all

10:33 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012

I believe it. Hannity . . . ugh! Hard to listen to, hard to look at. Can't, so won't.

Reply

Mary Lou

10:39 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012

@Mike Chubre- Benghazi is far beyond politics that we have four dead Americans that were denied their rights and abilities to have done their jobs they were asked to do, according to the prez, by him. You can snivel yourself about the fact that it is out in public view now, but I would venture to guess, you are a small small minority putting such a pittance of care about and for, your fellow Americans and the value of their lives. I dont know what Sean Hannity was doing your talking about as I dont watch him or listen to him, but if someone was crying, I am sure so are the relatives of those dead Americans. I am afraid the drums are going to beat much louder and will remain steady, in a demand for the answers regarding their loss of life.

Reply
Comment_arrow

NY Dumpster Diver

10:56 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012

Mary Lou, you're dealing with a complete nut bag here. Not worth the time or effort returning comments.

Mike Chubre

11:01 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012

Mary Lou Iam not saying we should not get the answers to the questions on Libya. Iam not letting anyone off the hook. What Iam saying is , there is a time and place for everything . This present government is far to smart to give out details to people without the "NEED TO KNOW". The public will get the answers in due time . When the president is good and ready we will get the facts. Most who are harping on this subject are just looking for an excuse to charge the president with the murders.

Reply
Comment_arrow

NY Dumpster Diver

11:15 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012

"The public will get the answers in due time"

Time is due. So goes for Obama's Fast and Furious debacle.

AMERICANS ARE DYING DUE TO OBAMA'S NEGLIGENCE

Mike Chubre

11:05 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012

Mary Lou I suggest you disregard comments like the ones above . Those types always resort to name calling when they have no answers

Reply

Mary Lou

11:22 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012

@ Mike Chubre- again, this is beyond politics and the time and place is yesterday, as in 7 weeks ago. This president promised and ran on transparency in his presidency in 2008 and we expect it and deserve it. Regardless of a campaign he has to run, this should be above such. Anyone "harping" on this has every right to demand those answers! There were televised pictures of the situation room regarding the death of Bin Laden along with a quick response of details. This calls for the same in every step of it. The information that has been shown regarding this, is not looking very good for him or his admin. We want answers, truthful answers, now.

Reply

Mike Chubre

1:41 am on Saturday, November 3, 2012

NY DUMPSTER DIVER Nice name and I suppose if you had to dumpster dive that would be obama fault also ? No matter who dropped the ball under Obama , if the ball was dropped ? You all still will not be happy unless Obama took the fall !! Right??? Boy you reps sure didnt have much to say when Bush dragged us into Iraq for "NOTHING" . And how many of our men and woman died being sent in unprepared ? Yes thats history I agree , but I hate the republicans double standards all the time. Its do as I say NOT do as I do with the reps. why is that? I hear that even republicans within the party are starting to see the light !!! Thats Great

Reply

thcooper69

7:22 am on Saturday, November 3, 2012

i dont think it will effect the way obama voters think or vote at all !
thay jus dont care where the check comes from ,jus that THAY get it and obama is a means to an end .

Reply
Comment_arrow

OICUR12

8:55 am on Saturday, November 3, 2012

If elected a second "rule" who will Obama blame for the last four years?

Tammy Osier

10:03 am on Saturday, November 3, 2012

Jim Aspen wrote:
Sandy-Starved New Yorkers Dumpster Dive
Where is Obama????????????????????????????????

Why Jim, the PHOTO-OP is over! Didn't you know that's more important than making sure people are not starving and that the federal government does its job?
He's back doing what he does best. Drawing attention to himself. Compare him to Bush now.

Reply

Tammy Osier

10:05 am on Saturday, November 3, 2012

What's sad, is that we've seen the real obama and yet, people will still vote for him. There's a saying about that, but probably not appropriate here.

Reply

Tammy Osier

10:16 am on Saturday, November 3, 2012

One poster asks:
So what is the CURRENT president's military record?
Did he by chance serve as a corpseman in one of the branches?
Don't expect an answer. You are dealing with hypocrites. Obama never served a day, nor did he even WANT to. He sat across the table with communists and radicals. YET, they want to criticize Romney for being a missionary. Telling. Very telling.

Reply

Tammy Osier

10:18 am on Saturday, November 3, 2012

Hey Sandy - the responses to your admonition to be "mature" totally proved your point LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL! Maybe they should look the word up. For some reason, makes me think of my little brother using bathroom humor when we were kids.

Reply

Mary Lou

12:02 pm on Saturday, November 3, 2012

@good grief- Thanks for the alert, conductor.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Good Grief Y'all

4:07 pm on Saturday, November 3, 2012

Didn't you already say that? All aboard! Welcome all who are bored.

Mike Chubre

3:47 pm on Saturday, November 3, 2012

News flash Obama will win EASY . All you republicans , you can pick up your box of kleenex at your local store . I know the truth hurts as they say , however at the end of the day you will understand why he won.

Reply

Mike Chubre

3:54 pm on Saturday, November 3, 2012

ny dumpster BOY I looked at your utube you sent . The BIG differance is Bush spent trillions on what ??? Not you and I !! He spent it on so called wars we had no business being in . And the total he left is not right . Figure the billions if not trillions that have to be spent on our troops who came back with no legs , arms mental illiness and all that goes with it!!! Plus how Bush made us look around the world !! We might as well had John Wayne as a president at that time.

Reply

Mike Chubre

3:58 pm on Saturday, November 3, 2012

ny dumpster BOY OH YES Your video where Ronald Regan said its not your government job to make jobs???? Then why all the BS about the jobs #s ?

Reply

Mike Chubre

4:01 pm on Saturday, November 3, 2012

The problem I see is this . OBAMA will win easy in my opinion . However will the reps continue to interfere with his jobs plans , like the reps have done for 4 years ? Or will the reps work with Obama ? At all Americans expense , the reps have not worked with Obama for all 4 years .

Reply

Tammy Osier

5:08 pm on Saturday, November 3, 2012

MIKe - not 4 years. The first two had full house and senate democrats. You may find it hard to believe, but much of his opposition came from blue dog democrats who probably could not in good conscience go along with pelosi and reid. Look it up. It's there if you really want to see it and have a conversation that has more than half truths in it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Good Grief Y'all

7:49 pm on Saturday, November 3, 2012

Oh, no, no, no. "Depending upon which metric is used, Democrats had a super majority for roughly six months which includes the seven weeks between Franken’s swearing-in on July 8 to Ted Kennedy’s death on August 25 and the four months and nine days between Paul Kirk’s swearing-in on September 25, 2009 to his replacement by Scott Brown on February 4, 2010. This was just barely enough time to pass the biggest and most difficult health care legislation in generations; an event that would likely never have happened under any other circumstances. This also happened under the onslaught of every procedural obstruction the Republicans could put in its path." http://538refugees.wordpress.com/2011/06/22/the-democratic-super-majority-myth/

Comment_arrow

Good Grief Y'all

7:57 pm on Saturday, November 3, 2012

" . . . the Dems only had a filibuster-proof majority (including two independents) from the time that Al Franken was finally seated (July 7, 2009) until the point that Teddy Kennedy passed away (August 25, 2009). That's only seven weeks, not two years.

"And there was never a supermajority in the House as Romney claims. The balance at the start of the Congress was 257 - 178, which is a Democratic share of only 59 percent, not 67. So again, Romney simply lied. Obama never had a super majority in both Houses, let alone for two years. In the Senate, his super-majority lasted seven weeks."
By the time Al Franken was sworn in on July 7, 2009, Ted Kennedy had not cast a Senate vote for about four months because he was terminally ill with brain cancer. (He died on August 25, 2009.) Robert Byrd was also hospitalized from May 18 through June 30, 2009 and may not have been well enough to attend Congress and vote for some time afterward. Thus the Democrats did not really have the 60 votes needed to break a filibuster until Kirk took office. Byrd (who died in June 2010) was also periodically too ill to attend and vote during the September 2009-February 2010 period"
http://andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com/2012/06/the-big-lies-of-mitt-romney-v-obama-had-a-super-majority-in-congress-for-two-years.html

Comment_arrow

Good Grief Y'all

8:13 pm on Saturday, November 3, 2012

"Gridlock in Congress? Blame the GOP" (Hey Newt & Grover!!)

"In their new book, "It's Even Worse Than It Looks," Thomas Mann and Norman Ornstein -- two of the most prominent talking heads in Washington, known for their balanced view and proclivity toward moderation -- say that the Republican Party is to blame.
"The GOP," they wrote in a Washington Post op-ed based on the book, "has become an insurgent outlier in American politics." Mann and Ornstein trace the partisan style back to the emergence of Newt Gingrich and Grover Norquist in the 1970s, when the two men promoted a style of slash-and-burn, take-no-prisoners politics that has remained integral to the strategy of congressional Republicans.
But the number of filibusters by Republicans has escalated, and they have been far more willing to use the tactic than their opponents. Since 2007, the Senate Historical Office has shown, Democrats have had to end Republican filibusters more than 360 times, a historic record.
Finally, there has been a much sharper shift to the right within the Republican Party than there has been to the left in the Democratic Party. Here, too, the data is rather clear." http://www.cnn.com/2012/05/21/opinion/zelizer-congress-polarization/index.html

Comment_arrow

Good Grief Y'all

8:17 pm on Saturday, November 3, 2012

I just love the www, don't y'all? Impossible to hide the lies with credible sources.

From the above linked article, a little something on the filibuster:

"But the number of filibusters by Republicans has escalated, and they have been far more willing to use the tactic than their opponents. Since 2007, the Senate Historical Office has shown, Democrats have had to end Republican filibusters more than 360 times, a historic record.
Finally, there has been a much sharper shift to the right within the Republican Party than there has been to the left in the Democratic Party. Here, too, the data is rather clear.
In January, political scientists Kenneth Poole and Christopher Hare concluded, based on their close analysis of the roll call vote, that "in the last few Congresses, the overlap has vanished; that is, the most liberal Republican is to the right of the most conservative Democrat."

David

7:16 pm on Saturday, November 3, 2012

Having just switched yesterday to become a Liberal, I was out protesting the local gun shop today (It's just a matter of time before some wacko from there starts shooting up the daycare next door) and heard some very disturbing news. Some expert that supposedly knows what is going on has predicted a landslide victory for Romney. I know I will be unable to vote on Tuesday because that is the day my government check arrives and I need to be home waiting for the mailman. I hope this isn't some Republican conspiracy, putting election day on the same day as government checks arrive.

Reply

Tammy Osier

9:46 pm on Saturday, November 3, 2012

David, you might as well make a day of it. After all, you may have to sign for your flat screen TV. LOL

Reply

Jim Aspen

3:30 am on Sunday, November 4, 2012

NY, NJ or Benghazi. Nothing will interfere with Obamas reelection quest

Reply

Mary Lou

8:17 am on Sunday, November 4, 2012

yeah well he wasted his super majority to do something other than truly help the crisis he claims he inherited, and do something beneficial for the American public. He instead chose to scheme and connive behind closed doors and hidden paperwork like an opportunistic predator, to shove the most destructive thing down the American public's throat with lasting damage and destruction beyond comprehension for years to come and still hasn't even shown its full hand of implications Really a president for the American people, NOT.Wonder if he would be enjoying a more solid attempt at re-election had he actual went to work for the American people that voted him in office, and at the same time, potentially shown those who didn't vote for him, that he actual was for helping and fixing. Also, what happened to all that transparency of his administration he promised err one?

Reply

jim

1:42 am on Monday, November 5, 2012

I think we're going to plump for http://www.outletcoachstoday.com the bigger one. It won't be the http://www.coachoutletod.com easiest to tow behind our push-bikes, http://www.coachs-outletcar.com particularly over Berlin's cobbles, but it will make http://www.coachoutletdp.com for swifter trips to interviews, http://www.coachoutletwo.com and it will save money for the licence-payer. http://www.coachfactoryoutletsp.com Berlin makes getting around http://www.coachfactoryoutletli.net on two wheels a pleasure.I have cycled in London http://www.coachfactoryoutletce.org but gave it up after too-many rants at a http://www.coachoutletonlinelc.net white van. But in Berlin, it is a joy. Firstly, the city is http://www.coachoutletonlinesc.com pretty flat, and secondly, there are endless cycle http://www.coachoutletonlinelsa.com tracks. Thirdly, everybody has a bike - so car-drivers are http://www.louisvuittonoutletct.com probably also cyclists in their other lives and so keep http://www.louisvuittonoutletti.org their eyes wide open.The test of whether cycling has really taken off in a city http://www.coachoutletrf.com is who does it. In New York, it is urban warriors, young men usually, who zip http://www.coachfactoryonlinebp.com aggressively between lanes.In London, it's a bit of that, but also, I suspect, http://www.coachoutletuser.net eco-zealots who are asserting their credentials - though the Boris bike scheme may be taking it more mainstream.In Berlin, it is the people.

Reply

Mike Chubre

2:00 am on Monday, November 5, 2012

Why dont the republicans on this site have any outrage for Bush sending our kids to war to a place we have no business going , but they can rant whine cry wimp about Libya ? 4 men who went on their own who knew the risks and decided to stay even after they were told they would get no help according to these whining reps on this site ? How many our kids came back missing legs arms etc etc while Bush was chopping wood on his ranch in Texas . Why do these reps have these double standards ? They must not be right in the head to not understand this double standard ? The reps think they are above it all and most are sunday catholics . Dont get in their way when they are leaving church on sunday or they will curse you and run you over !!! These holy rollers think they are above everyone . When Obama wins they will whine cry and maybe they will figure it out. Americans are not stupid . You dont go around the country telling stories , and each story is differant depending on who you are talking to. I have never in my life thought that republicans could make me as sick as they have this election. Cheat lie steal anything to win . Romney under estimates the American .

Reply

Mike Chubre

2:03 am on Monday, November 5, 2012

Tammy , if you look up half truth in Websters , you will see a picture of Romney .

Reply

Leave a comment