.
Feedback

Impact of Obamacare on Georgia

Sen. Jack Murphy (R-Cumming) speaks out on Obamacare.

Jack Murphy, who is seeking his fourth term in office for State Senate District 27 in Forsyth County, speaks out on Obamacare.

In a statement released Monday, Sen. Murphy writes:

Over the past few weeks, much has been said and debated about the Supreme Court’s decision to uphold Obamacare. I think it is truly a sad time in our nation’s history when our trusted leaders can single handedly rewrite the Constitution, diminishing the tireless efforts of many who fought to bring freedom and choice to our nation. Despite this setback, we must continue to fight to uphold the Constitution and prevent the Obama Administration from infringing on the rights of all Americans and Georgians. Two weeks ago, the Supreme Court turned a deaf ear to the voice of millions of Americans who spoke out against this plan, further weakening our nation’s founding principle of a democracy of the people, by the people.

As each of us try to make sense of the Supreme Courts ruling, it is helpful to look at Obamacare by the numbers to determine how it will impact the citizens of our state. Below you will find some helpful facts and figures which may shed some light on the program and how Georgia will fund and support this federal directive.

Obamacare’s projected impact on the state of Georgia:

Enrollment Growth

• An additional 620,000 people will be enrolled in Medicaid in 2014 growing to almost 695,000 by 2023

• The addition of 620,000 new people in 2014 represents a 34% increase in Medicaid rolls
 
• Obamacare will increase the percent of Georgians on Medicaid from 17.6 percent today to 24.2 percent in 2014

Projected State Fiscal Impact related to Medicaid and PeachCare

• 2014 (Six months cost – effective Jan. 1, 2014)
  o State Funds Cost: $76.3 million
  o Total Funds (State + Federal) Cost: $1.9 billion

• 2015
  o State Funds Cost: $219.8 million
  o Total Funds (State + Federal) Cost: $3.7 billion

• 10 Year total (2014 – 2023)
  o State Funds Cost: $4.5 billion
  o Total Funds (State + Federal) Cost: $40.8 billion

Our nation’s number one issue remains a suffering economy and dismal unemployment rates. There is no doubt that this federal mandate will kill the entrepreneurial spirit which makes our nation so great and further stifle the economy and slow job growth. A mandate such as this only perpetuates a dull economy by placing costly restrictions on our businesses and adding cost to the American family. This pricey agenda is not the answer that Americans were looking for. We can call it a fine or a tax - it will affect hard working Americans the same way. We can no longer stand for such blatant disregard for our voices and our nation’s Constitution. I hope that Americans use this election season to put leaders in place that honor the principles of our nation and support our Constitution.

Editor's Note: Cumming Patch is not affiliated with nor endorses any political party or candidate running for public office.

If you have a campaign announcement or press release – send that information to liz.kennedy@patch.com

Bill Evelyn July 10, 2012 at 06:13 pm
blah ... blah ... blah ... since when do you prove affection for the Constitution? What have you done during your tenure to stop encroachment of Washington DC in our state? Nothing.
You've done nothing to protect the people in this state. All you've done is look to enrich yourself on the backs of the Georgia citizens.
kimj July 10, 2012 at 08:51 pm
No one has to pay this ''fine or tax'' unless they choose to do so. When insurance is available, people should be responsible and buy it. If they truly can't afford it, then help will be provided. If they can afford to buy it and don't do so then they are passing the burden of their healthcare on to you and me -- and for that they should pay a ''fine or tax''.
Tom Ballard July 11, 2012 at 09:19 am
Yes...... I do, and I do NOT choose to! I am an employer that will now be forced to pay a fine for whoever has chosen to opt out of healthcare or have to pay their portion of chosen Obamacare. I am also a Christian who does NOT believe in abortion as birth control and will now have to pay a fine towards a healthcare system that will provide abortions for birth control - completely against my religious and moral beliefs (one of the more highly moral of my healthcare provision rejections). What is scary about the plan is not just simply the tax, but the fact that it is another way for a government to diminish religious and other freedoms. This should scare EVERYONE! It is not the governments right or responsibility to provide healthcare to it's inactive citizens at the cost of it's paying citizens. Instead of providing healthcare as a tax to the paying citizens how about having those who are provided the Obamacare work for it similar to community service. Now that would be a novice system! Fair and just and not impeding on others freedoms and inalienable rights. If you are a citizen who believes strongly in providing Obamacare to others then you would be given an opportunity to make charitable contributions to the system as your personal preference.... again not impeding on others freedoms or rights. Healthcare is a privilege that is individually earned and paid for, not a right forced on others. It is wrong..... put it on a ballot - see what happens that way.
david shelton July 11, 2012 at 12:50 pm
We all know someone who has lost their life due to no insurance and this economy, very sad that this should happen.Yet our republican leaders would continue to cry and cut support for our most needy and those that are barely getting by. This discusts me,and these shameful Repooplicans continue to give more and more breaks to the wealthy at the exspence of our most vulnerable. I'm not sure what PLANET these repooplicans are living on when a minimum wage job in their opinion should be enough to give a person all that they require.
Jonathan Penson July 11, 2012 at 01:53 pm
Jack is running scared.
david shelton July 12, 2012 at 02:11 am
I see the greedy have come out to post on ACA. Funny how some would let their fellow citizens die rather than join in a health care system that would give them access to doctors and medicine. Oh you know who you are. Very sad so many have lost their jobs and insurance that went along with it and have found they cannot afford the premiums that would give them medical treatment they need any longer. Then some greedy idiot says something like....let them get a job and pay for it like I do....well guess what, THERE ARE NO JOBS, less they be minumiun wage. Well for those GREEDY ( job creators ) suck it up you will now be paying the price for your slothfulness. HAVE A NICE DAY!
Pat July 12, 2012 at 01:14 pm
Yep...blah, blah, blah. Could we please have fact-based info?
Jack, why do you fear so much? And why do you think it's leadership to peddle fear? Where's the vision? Where's the leadership? Please quit screaming NO NO NO and come up with some solutions. The Republican vote in Congress yesterday to repeal ACA was nothing but a glorious grandstand and a waste of the money I pay in taxes. Their vote would have more credibility with me if 1) they had ANY plan whatsoever for replacing ACA; and 2) they hadn't voted down the suggestion that anyone voting against the ACA first give up their comprehensive government insurance; and 3) it didn't appear so vividly clear to me that they're merely trying to appease voters a because, God forbid they should lose their jobs and their insurance, too. (Oh wait...they have the best insurance plan in the land ...for life.) Jack, your talk is cheap. Have you ever been without medical insurance? Ever? Were your kids ever without it? I grew up without it. But don't worry; I'm white and my parents were never on welfare. I went to college and my brothers and sisters and I are productive members of society. I'm proud to say that our daughters graduated with honors from UGA. We're the very type you assume supports you. I might suggest you listen more closely to your constituents. And btw, every time one of those "deadbeats" on society who don't have insurance go to the emergency room, we're paying. All of us. Through the nose.
Georgia Thrasher July 12, 2012 at 04:18 pm
I would just like to point out the incredible lack of linear thinking in Mr. Shelton's thought process. First of all, one is not greedy if one does not want to pay for someone else's health care; rather it is the one demand that someone else pay for their healthcare that is greedy. If he, or anyone he knows, were to go to the hospital with a problem this very day, they would not and could not BY LAW be denied care. In addition, anyone who is unemployed or not covered because of an income deficiency IS ALREADY COVERED by a long-standing government program called MEDICAID. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medicaid)
Georgia Thrasher July 12, 2012 at 04:25 pm
Despite the fact that the Senator pontificates using the “low-hanging fruit” of an unpopular piece of legislation and an unpopular Supreme Court decision during an election year, his legislative actions do not always reflect his election year rhetoric. He either agrees with the “top-down” centralized government model, like President Obama and former Speaker Pelosi, or he does not. He would say that he does not. But is he objecting to their social values or their methods? In this regard, I find Senator Murphy’s vote for HB 214 somewhat puzzling.
The AJC reported that, “Channell's bill [HB 214] does not call for an increase in state money for public health. It would shift current public health operations and their current budgets into the new department” – (http://www.ajc.com/news/georgia-politics-elections/bill-to-create-public-893354.html). Sounds good on the surface, but where is the DECREASE in budget or personnel. Merely shifting employees and changing department names will not foster a better organizational structure or more efficiency in the system. All of the State Senators who voted against this bill, to a man, were Republicans. Perhaps they realized that rather than cutting waste and cost, and promoting efficiency, all HB 214 really did was create a new, more centralized, unelected and unaccountable body that is farther away and therefore less connected to the people it purports to serve.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Cumming Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jack Gleason June 1, 2013 at 11:00 am
"PAY NO ATTENTION TO THAT MAN BEHIND THE CURTAIN!" All is NOT what portends ofRead More "Oz"... : ? An excellent illumination of WHOM pulls-the-levers in politics today ~ KUDOS to Bill Evelyn.
Laura Jones May 26, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Congrats!!! A great achievement that you worked so hard. Are you going to write another?