.

Politically Correct Pedophilia

Sympathetic activists hold a conference encouraging society to connect emotionally with pedophiles to promote tolerance.

Just as the pedophile grooms and conditions his victims, the B4U-ACT group, a pro-pedophile organization, is being criticized for attempting to condition society to tolerate the "special feelings" pedophiles have for minors.

The group held a conference in Baltimore on August 17 that included clinicians, researchers and pedophiles talking about pedophilia and how those at risk for acting on their urges can seek real help. But the dominating topic of discussion was the group's intentions of changing the American Psychiatric Association's (APA) classification of pedophilia.

B4U-ACT classifies pedophilia as a different type of sexual orientation, just as gay or hetero are different from each other. (Super! Let's make new laws to protect all types of sexual orientation. What a circus society will be!)  

While B4U-ACT may have its heart in the right place with their willingness to help pedophiles manage their sexual feelings for children, the group's encouragement of using phrases such as, "minor-attracted persons" in place of "pedophiles" is very dangerous.

The B4U-ACT group repeatedly refers to pedophiles as, "minor-attracted persons." The reference is made ad nauseam and appears on the B4U-ACT Web site like flies at a picnic.

Is it all part of their audio/visual conditioning plan to achieve societal acceptance for pedophilia? Here's the thing--Society might be quite capable of tolerating the feelings defining pedophilia. It's what happens as a result of those feelings that causes a visceral reaction from the world.

B4U-ACT claims to help pedophiles with compassionate understanding and a clear distinction between feelings and illegal actions. However, empathetic terms aimed at softening the true threat behind pedophilia are just another violation against our children. Especially when B4U-ACT starts tampering with the APA's classification of pedophilia.

B4U-ACT's holy grail might just be forcing the nation to illegalize the National Registry for Sex Offenders so we don't hurt their feelings by "calling them out."

B4U-ACT harps on the concept that many people who are attracted to children have never once acted on those feelings by engaging a minor in sex. This is probably true, and I highly doubt these responsible, law-abiding citizens need their feelings validated by B4U-ACT or society as a whole.

It's coming across that B4U-ACT is trying to establish an empathetic response from society in order to create the path of open tolerance for pedophilia. Here's the problem with that approach--Paths often turn into major roadways where speed limits are ignored.

So here, let's simplify everything for the folks of B4U-ACT. Attraction to children is something a person can easily seek help for through counseling. Pedophiles already know this and they also know society respects their self-control. The last thing our children or pedophiles need is B4U-ACT blurring the line between right and wrong with carefully selected terminology designed to soften the consequences of pedophilia. 

This is no way to allay the fears of society, or the fears of a pedophile at risk of acting on his urges.

There is a bold line between right and wrong in society. Most of us clearly recognize that line every day in the things we say and do. We are all successfully controlling something in our lives. It is simply a part of respecting the difference between right and wrong. 

If pedophiles want to feel included in society as a whole instead of being labeled as an outcast, the road to success is quite simple,

Don't put your hands on a child. Ever. 

Don't have a child's hands on you. Ever.

Kristen Berry August 30, 2011 at 05:10 PM
"Sexual inclinations are among the most difficult to not act out and most psychologists will tell you that. Softening the legal stance and societal view of pedophilia via politically correct terminology is not constructive. There are good reasons why the condition is reviled and some things should be reviled."-- You hit the nail on the head here Faye. I agree with you 100%.
Katherine Nordal August 30, 2011 at 09:05 PM
The APA to which this article refers is the American PSYCHIATRIC Association not the psychological association!...Katherine Nordal, PhD, ED for Professional Practice at the Am Psychological Assn
Liz Kennedy August 30, 2011 at 10:06 PM
Thanks Katherine for the catch - we have corrected. Liz Kennedy, Editor
Danny Haszard September 07, 2011 at 06:55 PM
Please examine the Jehovah's Witnesses who go door to door and come on our property. Jehovah's Witnesses pedophiles. Many court documents and news events prove that Jehovah's Witnesses require two witnesses when a child comes forward with allegations of molestation within the congregation. Such allegations have customarily been treated as sins instead of crimes and are only reported to authorities when it is required to do so by law, (which varies by state). It has also been shown that child molesters within the organization usually have not been identified to the congregation members or the public at large. These people engage in a door to door ministry, possibly exposing children to pedophiles. The Watchtower corporation has paid out millions in settlement money already. -- Danny Haszard abuse victim http://www.dannyhaszard.com
Cheesus Toast September 05, 2013 at 08:10 PM
The term "minor-attracted persons" would be inaccurate anyway. Not all people who are attracted to minors are pedophiles because "minors" includes people under the age of 18 in many countries and states. A pedophile is someone who is attracted to prepubescents (which tend to be under 11 years of age). We are aware that legal systems often incorrectly use the term pedophile to mean someone who engages sexually with someone under the age of consent. That would obviously not constitute a medical condition if the child were physically developed/ developing. That would imply irresponsibility and not psychological instability. The terms should be used correctly and according to what they actually mean. This is possibly part of the problem. If everyone is lumped together then you are not dealing with specific problems relating to that individual. Is that person genuinely a pedophile or are they just someone who targets people who could be considered vulnerable? It makes a huge difference...

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »